wookster
Very foolish words man!
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2007
- Messages
- 5,824
- Reaction score
- 12
Apple get all legal on DiD's ass over Steve Jobs figure
- Thread starter wookster
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
This thing brought too much attention to itself, I guess. DiD certainly appear to be capitalizing on something that they haven't paid to use, so Apple and the Jobs estate has the right to go after this if they feel it is necessary.
I would suggest that they try to work with those groups to see if they might allow the sale if a percentage of the profits went to cancer research, but. . .all the profits DiD makes with this is probably less than what Apple makes in a second. I don't think money plays any role here, in other words.
I would suggest that they try to work with those groups to see if they might allow the sale if a percentage of the profits went to cancer research, but. . .all the profits DiD makes with this is probably less than what Apple makes in a second. I don't think money plays any role here, in other words.
EVILFACE
Super Freak
Would the law even apply to someone in China?
intothevoid
Batmod
To EF's point, I don't think Apple can really stop DiD 
I'm no lawyer, but I know that the vast bulk of international law concerns international trade. And foreign countries have an interest in following and enforcing that kind of law because it can hurt their standing with other countries vis-a-vis their ability to maintain minimal barriers to trade if they fail to do so (the WTO can make a U.S. President shake in his boots while he can ignore and dismiss international courts concerned with more explicitly political/security issues). But even domestically, I would imagine that China will have more anti-bootlegging/unlicensed product movement as more legit companies are built up and establish influence there.
The major threat to DiD in this instance, though, may be their ability to sell these in the U.S. U.S. laws frown on all this of course, and Apple can well threaten distributors and retailers trying to sell these here, which is presumably the primary customer base for this figure. They could also make life more difficult for DiD in general as time goes on by forcing them to defend themselves in court.
The major threat to DiD in this instance, though, may be their ability to sell these in the U.S. U.S. laws frown on all this of course, and Apple can well threaten distributors and retailers trying to sell these here, which is presumably the primary customer base for this figure. They could also make life more difficult for DiD in general as time goes on by forcing them to defend themselves in court.
It will probably be distributed by DID in China but not in the US.
intothevoid
Batmod
Actually I think DiD will easily find enough buyers for this outside the US
Jobs is worshipped in many parts of Asia. I can see this fetching gazillions on eBay/whereever people manage to sell it because
1. It won't be sold in the US
2. The free marketing it has received via Apples threats
VoidDweller
Super Freak
Here's a thread on the Steve Jobs figure already in motion ... https://www.sideshowcollectors.com/forums/showthread.php?t=104598
So Apple has a patent on Steve Jobs likeness? I honestly don't see how Apple will be able to stop n Icons/DID from selling the figure. However, I can see Steve's family estate having a better chance than corporate Apple. Unless Apple's lawyers are representing the Jobs estate.
Anyway, the laws in the U.S. vary from state to state in regard to making commercial gains from a celebrity, etc. that is already deceased. I think trying to stop a Chinese company under different international laws or no laws at all in their country regarding likeness from selling the figure online could be futile.
So Apple has a patent on Steve Jobs likeness? I honestly don't see how Apple will be able to stop n Icons/DID from selling the figure. However, I can see Steve's family estate having a better chance than corporate Apple. Unless Apple's lawyers are representing the Jobs estate.
Anyway, the laws in the U.S. vary from state to state in regard to making commercial gains from a celebrity, etc. that is already deceased. I think trying to stop a Chinese company under different international laws or no laws at all in their country regarding likeness from selling the figure online could be futile.
I figured Apple was taking issue, in part, with the Apple looking products being sold with this figure. But I'm sure that they would also foot the bill for any Jobs likeness related concerns.
But I just saw this:
https://appadvice.com/appnn/2012/01/steve-jobs-doll-legal-after-all
Tying this into the First Amendment is a bit of a stretch, though
But I just saw this:
https://appadvice.com/appnn/2012/01/steve-jobs-doll-legal-after-all
Tying this into the First Amendment is a bit of a stretch, though
VoidDweller
Super Freak
My understanding is in icons/DID says they are not selling any Apple related accessories (iPhone, iPad or Mac) with the Jobs figure or anything with Apple brand identity (i.e., logos). Thus, ensuring themselves one less wrangle from Apple's legal wrath.
Shropt
My Little Mod
My thoughts exactly. How does Apple own the likeness of Jobs himself?
They dont need to own the rights. I guess they just take caremof the legal actions in the name of the family. The media wont go that much into detail. Ofmcourse the family of Jobs can ask Apple to care for those actions.
jonny88
Super Freak
Why DID even made this guy is beyond me, they should just stick to their WW2 stuff. Anyway this probably wont be sold in the U.S., but l am sure we could buy them from China and Asia and have them shipped here no probllem if you wanted it.
intothevoid
Batmod
COSMOSTARX
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2011
- Messages
- 2,579
- Reaction score
- 2
No way they were gonna let this slip.
Lejuan
Super Freak
Best case scenario for flippers: DiD get this out before it goes to court; it goes to court and Apple wins, leaving DiD to cease production and recall unsold units; figure cost goes from $99 MSRP to $700 on ebay.
Similar threads
