BD IM MK 3 Lifesize Bust

[bumblebee]

anyone? so far i dont really see any committed buyers for this piece i think we should just all boycott this piece entirely

 

[quadcent]

anyone? so far i dont really see any committed buyers for this piece i think we should just all boycott this piece entirely

no kiddin, at least if they would've taken the leftovers and turned them into mark II's i could see how some people would justify it, but for sideshow to just take the damaged/subpar returnes and have a 10 year old kid through some paint on it, and take a tool and gouge it.....doesn't do it for me.
now maybe ssc will sell these for cheaper and more in the price range of past 1:1's maybe NOT.

i guess the second chance offering of the slightly damaged markIII's didn't go over so well for only $50 discount.

 

[Husenfatal22]

i would pay $250

 

[quadcent]

i would pay $250

SOLD SOLD SOLD

 

[LOTRFan]

That's kinda funny, really.

 

[azurepred]

i guess there taking a move from hot toys, but shame it doesnt work for $700 pieces

 

[dhampir46]

I would buy this, but I don't have the original,
don't hate though, it would go next to 1:1 arnold.

 

[mt24]

Very creative.

 

[ChrisCJ99]

Very creative.

Seriously...... This was SO predictable

 

[The Mike]

This is pretty much how I feel on this:

Pepper: Sideshow just announced a Battle Damaged Iron Man life size bust. Do you want it yes or no?
Tony: Is it a good representation of Battle Damage?
Pepper: Um....no the battle damage is actually just a continuation of the flaws that were already in the pieces returned not battle damage like something newly created. I think its a fair example, um...I think it'll be incredibly overpriced.
Tony: I need it. Buy it, display it.
Pepper: Okaaaay.

 

[ChrisCJ99]

This is pretty much how I feel on this:

Pepper: Sideshow just announced a Battle Damaged Iron Man life size bust. Do you want it yes or no?
Tony: Is it a good representation of Battle Damage?
Pepper: Um....no the battle damage is actually just a continuation of the flaws that were already in the pieces returned not battle damage like something newly created. I think its a fair example, um...I think it'll be incredibly overpriced.
Tony: I need it. Buy it, display it.
Pepper: Okaaaay.

Perfectly put.....

 

[Darth Waller]

 

[Bodie The Cursed]

LMAO.. this is why they werent giving you goobers returns... Watch it be over 700 bucks..



< LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[averone]

This is pretty much how I feel on this:

Pepper: Sideshow just announced a Battle Damaged Iron Man life size bust. Do you want it yes or no?
Tony: Is it a good representation of Battle Damage?
Pepper: Um....no the battle damage is actually just a continuation of the flaws that were already in the pieces returned not battle damage like something newly created. I think its a fair example, um...I think it'll be incredibly overpriced.
Tony: I need it. Buy it, display it.
Pepper: Okaaaay.

Oh boy!!!

 

[Silent December]

"Tony: I need it. Buy it, display it. "

Hey, you just nailed my collecting philosophy.

 

[Bodie The Cursed]

Still laughing over this

 

[zoid2323]

Wow at least Bowen changed the sculpt a little and actually added battle damage to the statue not just repaint the same piece...LOL nice try Sideshow.

 

[Bodie The Cursed]

i bet SOLIDSNAKE raves about this..

 

[jye4ever]

Let me see if I can say this loud and clear so that SS can hear me

SS should pay me to own that head of silliness

 

[Balsquat]

Was the original even that big of a hit with collectors?
Why cant they give us a "battle damaged" alien Warrior 1:1 or sumthing worth displaying?