Dr.Mirakle32
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 2,855
- Reaction score
- 20
To all those people against a recasting, remember Indy already was recast! Anybody remember River Phoenix, Sean or Patrick Flannery, et al?
This may sound insane, but what about Luke Wilson? I think he looks a little like a young Ford, and he's a pretty good actor. We all know he can pull off the comedic aspects of the character, as well as the serious ones. I say make at least two more films after this next one, and have them be set in the early 1940's, showing some post-LC and pre-KOTCS adventures. That way, we can have a return to the pulpy, serial, nazi-fighting feel of the originals, and we could have (at least) six solid IJ films to compliment the STAR WARS series.
pics comparing Ford and Wilson:
Make any new IJ films prequels or interquels, so we can have one solid contnuity, rather than a fresh reboot.
Honestly, IMHO recasting Indiana Jones and setting future films in the 30's and 40's, is a MUCH better idea than possibly continuing the series with Shia Labouf as the new "Indy".
This may sound insane, but what about Luke Wilson? I think he looks a little like a young Ford, and he's a pretty good actor. We all know he can pull off the comedic aspects of the character, as well as the serious ones. I say make at least two more films after this next one, and have them be set in the early 1940's, showing some post-LC and pre-KOTCS adventures. That way, we can have a return to the pulpy, serial, nazi-fighting feel of the originals, and we could have (at least) six solid IJ films to compliment the STAR WARS series.
pics comparing Ford and Wilson:
Make any new IJ films prequels or interquels, so we can have one solid contnuity, rather than a fresh reboot.
Honestly, IMHO recasting Indiana Jones and setting future films in the 30's and 40's, is a MUCH better idea than possibly continuing the series with Shia Labouf as the new "Indy".
Last edited: