Ironman Mark VII Legendary Scale???
- Thread starter tommyh84
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
RobertoBagg10
Super Freak
its a great question Pau
to be honest, I don't ever remember seeing the triangle reactor visible when he wore the MKVII suit in the movie...then again, the arc reactor was always lit up in the movie so all you'd see would be a bright light shining through. Perhaps maybe if the suit was idle then you might see it 
With that said, I'm okay with the way Sideshow have done it on their LSF and we'll more than likely see it on their 1/4 scale maquette but there really isnt any excuse to have cut corners on the lifesize bust. They showed us with the War Machine lifesize bust that they could really nail a detailed Arc Reactor, so that was the biggest disappointment for me
Asdf
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2012
- Messages
- 13,271
- Reaction score
- 11
its a great question Pau
With that said, I'm okay with the way Sideshow have done it on their LSF and we'll more than likely see it on their 1/4 scale maquette but there really isnt any excuse to have cut corners on the lifesize bust. They showed us with the War Machine lifesize bust that they could really nail a detailed Arc Reactor, so that was the biggest disappointment for me
I also didn't notice until XM Mark VII. If without the lights on, it would be nice to see a detailed arc reactor, because the statue won't be lit up at our home 247. For the price tag, we should be getting the most detailed and screen accurate (Especially considering Legacy work side by side with SS on this project). I really wish SS would have a respond to this.
myfeetarehappy
Super Freak
Each suit has it's own circular Arc Reactor. When the suit is powered up it appears externally as a glowing white disc (or triangle on the MK VI)...
With more detail of the suit's AR under the armour...
Stark's chest AR is separate...
There is a scene which shows the MK VII suit AR powered down and therefore visible...
So the triangle AR in the XM statue is artistic license...but looks good all the same
The interplay between the suit's AR and the one in Stark's chest has always been a bit vague...but oh well.
myfeetarehappy
Super Freak
Oh...and as such the triangle suit AR on the MK VI 1:2 Bust by Sideshow is inaccurate regardless of which way up it is... LOL
Asdf
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2012
- Messages
- 13,271
- Reaction score
- 11
That one was a disaster. The recast got it right while SS is wrong
So I assume the correct is round shape for Mark VII? I wish SS has a foto zoom of the reactor without lights on, and you can see all the details on it, instead of just blurry glass.
Grumpy Bear
Super Freak
That´s so funny. You can see no triangle in the movie, but XM do it and its great. If SS do a triangle that wasn´t there it will be the **** of the day.
Hey, you are not fanboy´s w/o brain, or?
Hey, you are not fanboy´s w/o brain, or?
Spidey976
Super Freak
Tweak kind of...lol
That´s so funny. You can see no triangle in the movie, but XM do it and its great. If SS do a triangle that wasn´t there it will be the **** of the day.
Hey, you are not fanboy´s w/o brain, or?
Yep XM is inaccurate, BUT that is okay because ... Oh never mind...lol
Asdf
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2012
- Messages
- 13,271
- Reaction score
- 11
That´s so funny. You can see no triangle in the movie, but XM do it and its great. If SS do a triangle that wasn´t there it will be the **** of the day.
Hey, you are not fanboy´s w/o brain, or?
And that's why I am checking with you guys
. If it looks goods, it looks good despite inaccurate 
Time to question XM triangle now
RobertoBagg10
Super Freak
That one was a disaster. The recast got it right while SS is wrong
If SS do a triangle that wasn´t there it will be the **** of the day.
Hey, you are not fanboy´s w/o brain, or?
Grumpy Bear
Super Freak
Yes Andy this was true ****, but you know what i mean. 
Asdf
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2012
- Messages
- 13,271
- Reaction score
- 11
Hey, you are not fanboy´s w/o brain, or?
Pardon me, but not sure what exactly you mean?
Grumpy Bear
Super Freak
I think this from Spidey explain it perfect. Or in other words be fair to both sides.
Asdf
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2012
- Messages
- 13,271
- Reaction score
- 11
I think this from Spidey explain it perfect. Or in other words be fair to both sides.
Gotcha. My money goes to best statues with best price
Spidey976
Super Freak
I think this from Spidey explain it perfect. Or in other words be fair to both sides.
More like not wanting to bring all the crud associated with that line of discussion into this thread
Spidey976
Super Freak
Nothing more than a playful joke
Something like @myfeetarehappy posted but in HD?
Source:
https://movie-screencaps.com/the-avengers-2012/85/
Chr0n0
Super Freak
Each suit has it's own circular Arc Reactor. When the suit is powered up it appears externally as a glowing white disc (or triangle on the MK VI)...
View attachment 125347
So the triangle AR in the XM statue is artistic license...but looks good all the same
The interplay between the suit's AR and the one in Stark's chest has always been a bit vague...but oh well.
The MK IV, VI, VII etc. have their own reactors (also the retrofitted MK II so Rhodey could wear it). The I, II, III and V were powered only by Tony's reactor.
I've always thought that the suits with built in reactors would use Tony's as backup or a booster battery. But yes, it's never explained in the movies.
Similar threads
