- Joined
- Jan 5, 2008
- Messages
- 35,160
- Reaction score
- 2
Adrian Brody >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You.
And you can only rewatch a movie that's as long as that so many times.
It's good that there's no room for a sequel though. A clear sign of a great film is desperately wanting a more when it's over, but knowing you'll never see more because everything has been said and done.
Perfect and complete.
Jackson outdid himself.
Holy ____ man.I miss it.
Jackson's Kong serves to show how on the ball Merian Cooper was. He kept the original moving along so briskly that you never stop to consider how outrageous the whole thing is.Sadly, PJ did not recognize this fundamental concept. The original stands...PS
Talk about ironic. The ADD younguns defending a movie that the old farts thought was too long.
I had no issue with the length. I was rapt, and didn't want it to end (mostly because I didn't want to see the hero die), which is what I want from any movie. I tend to prefer novels over films (big novels--Les Miserables, Atlas Shrugged, The Stand, Brothers Karamazov, Count of Monte Cristo, etc.) and this movie, like LOTR before it (I saw Fellowship of the Ring nine times in the theater, Two Towers six times, and Return of the King seven), delivered.
I like the new submissive DiFabio. You wanna get me a beer? Their right there in the fridge.
I'm unable to comply until you fix your grammatical error. Once edited, I'd be happy to get you your choice of alcoholic beverage.
DiFabio said:Might I suggest sitting back and drinking it while watching the 2005 masterpiece, King Kong?
Enter your email address to join: