Who is ready for sub groups

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I'm not a huge fan of the the subforum approach. I only collect certain things, but with it all combined I'm more likely to be exposed to interesting pieces.

I already don't like having the custom separate as I don't check it as often and tend to miss things. Although for how robust it has become I can understand it being given its own section.
 

Actually, you couldn't be further from the truth. I stated earlier on, several times here, that I prefer the customs in the main thread. It was a hell of a lot better seeing positive threads for a change than reading all the continual b**ching about Vader's dome or stormtrooper teeth. :rolleyes: Besides, with the exception of maybe 4 threads and some idiot necroposter, the main board all but dried up.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Actually, you couldn't be further from the truth. I stated earlier on, several times here, that I prefer the customs in the main thread. It was a hell of a lot better seeing positive threads for a change than reading all the continual b**ching about Vader's dome or stormtrooper teeth. :rolleyes: Besides, with the exception of maybe 4 threads and some idiot necroposter, the main board all but dried up.

There you go, will besides the new sideshow 12inch Vader, I could give a rats @$$ about the 12inch stuff. I'm all about PF, or the lifesized. I really like seeing the customs. I just hate surfing through all the extra garb to find what I want to see. I know more would use the boards as well if it had a little more structure.

Thanks for sharing your views.
 
There you go, will besides the new sideshow 12inch Vader, I could give a rats @$$ about the 12inch stuff. I'm all about PF, or the lifesized. I really like seeing the customs. I just hate surfing through all the extra garb to find what I want to see. I know more would use the boards as well if it had a little more structure.

Thanks for sharing your views.

I enjoy it all, so we can agree to disagree. :lol:rock
 
There you go, will besides the new sideshow 12inch Vader, I could give a rats @$$ about the 12inch stuff. I'm all about PF, or the lifesized. I really like seeing the customs. I just hate surfing through all the extra garb to find what I want to see. I know more would use the boards as well if it had a little more structure.

Thanks for sharing your views.


QFT :lecture
 

statue-forum-01.gif
 
The forums are already separated into sections, topics and then threads. And topics are generally the same thing as sub-groups. To me, this is really just about adding new levels to the current organization. And beyond the basics...few people organize exactly like the next person. I am all for the adding of levels to the organization, but it can be taken too far. Even to the point of the organization becoming a detriment to its own effectiveness.

As it stands right now, I think the biggest problem with the clarity of the forums is a few of the thread starters not taking in to consideration how to word the thread title in such a way that the content is concise, but cleary stated. For example over in the Joe section, there are multiple threads for Firefly. There are 2 threads for basic discussion of the Sideshow 1:6 figure, one called "Firelfy?", one called "Sideshow Firefly", there is one about a revision to a custom Firefly called "Firefly V.2", and one specific to the hate on the Sideshow Firefly called "Poll: The Firefly controversy". And this is just an example, this condition exists all over the forum.

And the only two that make the content clear are "Sideshow Firefly" and "Poll: The Firefly controversy". Now, "Firefly?" is the primary Thread for the Sideshow Figure. If it had been named clearly in the first place, the second one "Sideshow Firefly" likely would not have been started. And if "Firefly V.2" had been more clearly titled as "My custom Firefly V2.0" then it would be even less likely to be mistaken for say...the hoped-for result of all of the whining they are doing over there about the current Firefly being offered by Sideshow.

If the thread starters would just make sure that they are more specific about the intended thread content by keeping them simple and adding the critical information such as full, correct name of the collectible piece or set and exactly what is to be discussed...even the searches would be easier...and the confusion would clear at least a little. And then, if a second closely related thread gets started such as the Firefly Poll, it will be a lot less annoying than it seems to be to some (no, I am not one of them) as it would happen much less frequently.

I would even be for having the mods create a standard format for naming threads and requiring the members to submit new threads to the mods to post in order to keep things from getting to far out of hand if it ever became necessary to do that. I don't think it is at that point yet, but I would be good with it just the same. And this could be done by the mods anticipating the obvious threads that would be started such as "Darth Maul: Sideshow Toy's 1:6 Scale Action Figure - General Discussion" Or Asajj Ventress: Sideshow Toy's 1:4 Scale Premium Format Figure - General Discussion", or, if a specific aspect of the figure ended up warranting it's own thread, "Obi-Wan Kenobi(The Clone Wars - Clone Armor): Sideshow 1:6 Scale Action Figure - Ewan McGregor likeness discussion" or as in the case of Firefly, "Firefly: Sideshow 1:6 Scale Action Figure: Design Discussion." And then if a member wants to discuss a topic that does not exist, say a character that they would like to see made, they could just they could just use a pre developed system for contacting all the mods in a subject and whichever one is available can create the thread.

And the mods could be liberal enough with that in the case of someone who understandably does not want to sort through 1000 posts about general discussion to find posts on a specific aspect that might draw a reasonably sized discussion. For example, if I were a mod under these conditions, I would not be OK with starting a thread on the color of Firefly' balaclava, but I would be OK with starting a thread for the discussion of his overall design.

I am also aware that this kind of system would have it's own issues. And a new issue or two might be created. For example, this one would take some of the freedoms away from the members where discretion of starting new threads goes (and I know that some of the members would have an issue with that). Every system has it's flaws. But I do believe that it would make the boards, in general, easier to navigate and search.
 
Have a close look at the thread titles here. Some freaks can't even take the time to spell correctly, let alone look at other thread titles. :lol
 
Have a close look at the thread titles here. Some freaks can't even take the time to spell correctly, let alone look at other thread titles. :lol


LOL...See? That's part of my point. If the mods have to set up the threads, a lot of that can be eliminated.:D






Probably not all of it, though.:monkey3
 
LOL...See? That's part of my point. If the mods have to set up the threads, a lot of that can be eliminated.:D



robably not all of it, though.:monkey3

Yes, sounds like a good use of time. Anyone want to pay for 2 or 3 full time employees to rename all the threads as people post them?

I know more would use the boards as well if it had a little more structure.

Thanks for sharing your views.


So we'd have more members if there was more structure here like on SF or RS? Not sure that there's MORE structure at SF, just a DIFFERENT structure.
 
The only person that has mentioned Statueforum is the guy who can't face change of any kind.

I think all the OP is looking for is the ability to avoid all of the figure threads. Too bad we can't discuss it without some **** **** coming through and crying about "oh please don't change anything" despite the fact it might make the site easier to use for the people requesting the change. As long as he's happy, EFF the rest of us. All he seems to know how to do is direct us to other forums.

I don't see why you couldn't separate the board, and on the top page, leave a 'New Posts' button that would show all the new posts from both sections, and then have separate 'New Posts' buttons inside each section of the forum. That would satisfy the guy who wants to 'see everything' but some of us just don't have the time for that. Some of us have lives, but would still like to participate on the board, but it's frustrating to dig through 75 percent of the board that doesn't interest us, to get to the 25 that does.

It's kind of like when you changed the board theme. You still allowed those of us who like the old scheme to still use it.
 
Last edited:
The only person that has mentioned Statueforum is the guy who can't face change of any kind.

I think all the OP is looking for is the ability to avoid all of the figure threads. Too bad we can't discuss it without some **** **** coming through and crying about "oh please don't change anything" despite the fact it might make the site easier to use for the people requesting the change. As long as he's happy, EFF the rest of us. All he seems to know how to do is direct us to other forums.

I don't see why you couldn't separate the board, and on the top page, leave a 'New Posts' button that would show all the new posts from both sections, and then have separate 'New Posts' buttons inside each section of the forum. That would satisfy the guy who wants to 'see everything' but some of us just don't have the time for that. Some of us have lives, but would still like to participate on the board, but it's frustrating to dig through 75 percent of the board that doesn't interest us, to get to the 25 that does.

It's kind of like when you changed the board theme. You still allowed those of us who like the old scheme to still use it.

I dunno. Seems rather selfish to argue that the Administrator change his vision of what the forum should be, to suit your own personal needs. But maybe that's just me. :huh
 
The owner of the site has already posted that the OP, "has a point" and that he has been thinking about it. I'm not sure why you're so interested in it. There are no changes mentioned that would really affect your ability to 'see everything'. There are those of us that don't want to 'see everything' I can't figure out why that ruffles your feathers so much, and why you keep coming back and trying to defend the status quo. No one has mentioned subdividing the forum in a million different ways. I think something in the past has rubbed you the wrong way, and now you are trying to keep that thing, whatever it was, from happening again.
 
I dunno. Seems rather selfish to argue that the Administrator change his vision of what the forum should be, to suit your own personal needs. But maybe that's just me. :huh

This is a very good point. And, although I have expressed an opinion on the subject. I should make it clear that it is easy to see that the current system has been working fine for a long time. And I am just rolling thoughts around.
 
The owner of the site has already posted that the OP, "has a point" and that he has been thinking about it.

I said it was worthy of discussion and could be considered if there was support - but I greatly lean towards NOT separating it.

To everyone in this thread:
I re-opened this thread because I think the topic IS worthy of discussion. However if name calling and idiotic childish behavior continues, we'll just ban those members.

I do think the idea of a self-regulated post icon might be a way to go though.
 
Back
Top