They did Sucker Punch?
Batman Forever > Batman and Robin > Terminator 3 Rise of the Machines > Sucker Punch
Yeah but Sucker Punch was a new film with hype behind it.
Batman Forever's hype is way back in 1994!
WISH LIST - Hot Toys - DX - Mr. Freeze (Arnold Schwarzenegger)
- Thread starter DiFabio
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Yeah but Sucker Punch was a new film with hype behind it.
Batman Forever's hype is way back in 1994!
spindrift
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 13,328
- Reaction score
- 121
Well put- the bombs they made figures of were upcoming NEW films they were hoping would take off...
Now we all know about B&R and no one could conceive of HT taking that plunge...
S. Griffin
Super Freak
Get your logic out of here. No one could logically want Hot Toys figures from Batman and Robin (no matter which ____ing character it is), so it therefore has no place here.
Uncanny Web-Slinger
Super Freak
1995 !
Sucker Punch > Terminator 3 > Batman Forever > Batman and Robin
you'll take John Connor from T3 over Clooney's Batman??
S. Griffin
Super Freak
Why does that get ?
Dude, I'd take a dog turd with a face over Clooney's Batman.
?Dude, I'd take a dog turd with a face over Clooney's Batman.
Uncanny Web-Slinger
Super Freak
you'll take John Connor from T3 over Clooney's Batman??
In terms of movie quality and enjoyment i'd take T3 over B&R anyday
I am really talking about acton figures, i.e. you'll take a figure of T3's John Connor, or Batman from B & R.. ??? .. Batman & Robin sucks as a movie, but the suits are well done
PS: T3 sucks too, I take Batman Forever over T3 .. everyday
Uncanny Web-Slinger
Super Freak
in terms of figures i'd go for the same as before... Sucker Punch > Terminator 3 > Batman Forever > Batman and Robin
Sucker Punch has the five main girls all with unique outfits and weapons.
T3 figures would include Arnie and TX, maybe a HK, before they do Connor or Brewster.
Forever would feature Riddler, Batman and Two-face, i'd probably get Riddler.
Then Finally B&R, I wouldn't get any but Freeze and Robin would be the only that'd peak interest in seeing how HT handle them.
I know it came out in 95 but the hype machine must have been going from 94 no?
S. Griffin
Super Freak
Vut almost killed zee Batman movie franchise? Ziss movie.
EdwardNashton1
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2009
- Messages
- 6,205
- Reaction score
- 1
Get your logic out of here. No one could logically want Hot Toys figures from Batman and Robin (no matter which ____ing character it is), so it therefore has no place here.
Generalizing is not a wise course of action.
Especially when I and obviously a good amount of others in this thread would want an Arnold Mr. Freeze figure.
DGTWoodward
Super Freak
I too, came to this thread rather late and found that the poll had already closed, why was that again..It's been asked three time now and still there has been no answer....? So from reading through, there seems to be a very obvious but actually interfering thought path being taken here, that is..
The fact that the movie was an overblown, cheese-filled, be-nippled crap-fest...
...seems to somehow be making people blind to the fact that some well made (ie HOT TOYS of perhaps MEDIACOM) figures from these films would and could actually look pretty good. One of these being Mr. Freeze. Why not? It certainly would look as good as/better perhaps than IRON MAN. To clarify my thought here, let's look at BATMAN to begin with.
Is there really that much difference between Keaton bat-suit No1 and No2, when compared to the Kilmer No1 and Clooney No1 suits? No of course not, let's face it, they are all pretty much-of-a-muchness in appearance, they are all BAT suits so they will all look about the same.
But it seems here that most people would not even touch a Clooney#1 BAT. It seems strange to me as a BATMAN fan, that people would not like a figure that showed the first modern-era appearance on the big screen of the characters of ROBIN, or The RIDDLER, TWO FACE, Mr FREEZE and so on.
Yes the movie was terrible, in a 'so cheesily awful it's actually quite enjoyable' sort of way, but people here are allowing their dislike of the actual film, to colour their opinion of a possibly knock-out looking figure...which Mr. Freeze certainly would be. The two BATMAN movies of the Schumacher era are visually lush, and full of vibrant, colourful character design...just scroll back up to the movie poster again, it's a beautiful piece of art work.
Just try and put the dislike you feel for the film in itself, out of your minds for a moment, and disable that pathway for a few seconds. Just imagine what HT (whether it happens or not - and I personally, sadly, think 'not') could do with the figure. It could be amazing to look at on a shelf, next to...
BATMAN & JOKER (Bat '89)
BATMAN, PENGUIN & CATWOMAN (B/Returns)
BATMAN, ROBIN (Classic style), RIDDLER, 2-FACE (B/Forever)
BATMAN, ROBIN (Night Wing style), POISON IVY, BANE (B&R)
BATMAN, ROBIN (1966 Adam + Burt), JOKER, PENGUIN, RIDDLER, CATWOMEN (various)
I would vote "YES"
The fact that the movie was an overblown, cheese-filled, be-nippled crap-fest...
...seems to somehow be making people blind to the fact that some well made (ie HOT TOYS of perhaps MEDIACOM) figures from these films would and could actually look pretty good. One of these being Mr. Freeze. Why not? It certainly would look as good as/better perhaps than IRON MAN. To clarify my thought here, let's look at BATMAN to begin with.
Is there really that much difference between Keaton bat-suit No1 and No2, when compared to the Kilmer No1 and Clooney No1 suits? No of course not, let's face it, they are all pretty much-of-a-muchness in appearance, they are all BAT suits so they will all look about the same.
But it seems here that most people would not even touch a Clooney#1 BAT. It seems strange to me as a BATMAN fan, that people would not like a figure that showed the first modern-era appearance on the big screen of the characters of ROBIN, or The RIDDLER, TWO FACE, Mr FREEZE and so on.
Yes the movie was terrible, in a 'so cheesily awful it's actually quite enjoyable' sort of way, but people here are allowing their dislike of the actual film, to colour their opinion of a possibly knock-out looking figure...which Mr. Freeze certainly would be. The two BATMAN movies of the Schumacher era are visually lush, and full of vibrant, colourful character design...just scroll back up to the movie poster again, it's a beautiful piece of art work.
Just try and put the dislike you feel for the film in itself, out of your minds for a moment, and disable that pathway for a few seconds. Just imagine what HT (whether it happens or not - and I personally, sadly, think 'not') could do with the figure. It could be amazing to look at on a shelf, next to...
BATMAN & JOKER (Bat '89)
BATMAN, PENGUIN & CATWOMAN (B/Returns)
BATMAN, ROBIN (Classic style), RIDDLER, 2-FACE (B/Forever)
BATMAN, ROBIN (Night Wing style), POISON IVY, BANE (B&R)
BATMAN, ROBIN (1966 Adam + Burt), JOKER, PENGUIN, RIDDLER, CATWOMEN (various)
I would vote "YES"
Last edited:
Slickgonzalez
Freakzoid
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2011
- Messages
- 91
- Reaction score
- 0
DGTWoodward - You're exactly right. And how can we forget the beautiful Uma Thurman as Poison Ivy? I'd buy them all and I hate those movies! But the character designs were pretty great, excluding batnipples.
Mr. EcKo
OG Freak
S. Griffin
Super Freak
And yet most don't.
There was also no element of screwing around in my post. Seriously, though, that movie is an abomination of cinema.
freestylex06x
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2008
- Messages
- 1,249
- Reaction score
- 51
why is this thread still going? a dx mr freeze is the dumbest idea i've heard of. it is never going to happen so let this thread die.
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sw6ndZNLYUA[/ame]
Similar threads
