Will they even invest in the WW movie license for probably only 1 piece? Probably will have to wait for a 1/3 from the JL movie to get a 1/3.
Statue Prime 1 Studio - Dawn of Justice- 1:2 Wonder Woman Statue
- Thread starter CallMeTheDoctor
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Will they even invest in the WW movie license for probably only 1 piece? Probably will have to wait for a 1/3 from the JL movie to get a 1/3.
Uncle Bingo
Love that Joker
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2014
- Messages
- 1,934
- Reaction score
- 293
Going by this poster they had at Wonderfest they already have the WW movie license:
KryptoSlush
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2017
- Messages
- 299
- Reaction score
- 10
Either the scale for Batman is too big or Superman is too small. I realize Affleck is a few inches taller than Cavill, but in the film they're the same height and going by those statues, Batfleck looks to be half a foot taller than Superman.
The Batman statue is 2 inches taller, but Batman has the Bat ears. I suspect that if you measured to the top of the head on each, they'd be the same size.
dan350zr
Super Freak
If only BvS was a big hit... I'd be way more tempted to get these 1/2 scale statues....
It looks about perfect to my eye. At that angle Ben is closer to the camera so it will look a bit taller.
Why would that matter? Are you concerned for value if you ever want to sell? I have a few pieces from bad movies(Wolf Pred & Predalien from AVPR, TX from Terminator 3, etc...) so that doesn't bother me even though I actually do like most of BvS.
Yeah batfleck was awesome enough for me to have this statue. I'm not even that big a fan of the keaton films, but I love keaton as batman. Sometimes designs and characters simply speak to you, regardless of the source material.
Darkavatar
Super Freak
Yeah looks like the only thing SS got right was the jaw shape, as the cheek bones are more prominent. But it doesn't look like her.
Going by this poster they had at Wonderfest they already have the WW movie license:
So the Joker is the smallest statue out of all of these, despite that Ledger was much taller than Gal Gadot? Doesn't even look like the Joker is in the same scale as the rest.
Darkavatar
Super Freak
Great pictures once again tofmovie but why are all of them taken on angles, why is there not one single picture showing the portrait, whether up close or from a distance like this one below?
Someone really needs to take a close of up picture of the portrait, so we can see how good the likeness is from front on.
Someone really needs to take a close of up picture of the portrait, so we can see how good the likeness is from front on.
Great pictures once again tofmovie but why are all of them taken on angles, why is there not one single picture showing the portrait, whether up close or from a distance like this one below?
Someone really needs to take a close of up picture of the portrait, so we can see how good the likeness is from front on.
All the photos were taken from several angles following some "criticisms" concerning the resemblance of the personage.
Personally, I love it, I can not wait to receive it.
Here is another photos taken in front ...
Karnis
Super Freak
Yeah, you can tell from the profile shots that the likeness is there. The thing that scares me off from this would be the rooted hair. That's gotta be tough to style and maintain, & I would also worry about it's longevity.
Darkavatar
Super Freak
Well as long as you love it that's the main thing.
Hmm doesn't really look like her from the front, the face is too oval, it should get narrower as it reaches the chin due to her prominent cheek bones, which create a V shape kind of face. But they are just not prominent enough like they are on the Sideshow statue. The shape of the face should look more like Sideshows, granted that part is really the only thing that Sideshow appeared to get right.
That really means nothing, since a lot of sculpts look good on profiles and angles, but fail when it comes to portrait shots. Not saying this looks nothing like her, just saying the likeness isn't good enough IMO.
Last edited:
It would be nice to see a shot with decent lighting to make a final decision.
Darkavatar
Super Freak
Well no amount of lighting will change the outline of the face because the cheek bones are just not as prominent as they should be.
Thus, the shape of the face will never look like how it does in these pictures.
However, better lighting might show how good the core likeness is of her face, such as the nose, eyes and mouth etc.
CallMeTheDoctor
Super Freak
With the in hand pics of Supes, I'm very hesitant on this. I imagine that Batfleck came out amazing due to minimal skin exposure. WW is like 60% skin...
And hair. Don't forget the hair.
