You missed shoulder gap gate when the 45 came out? How? You were a member of this forum during this time.
1/6 Hot Toys - MMS353 D16 - CA: Civil War - Iron Man Mark XLVI Collectible Figure
- Thread starter Bri
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
You missed shoulder gap gate when the 45 came out? How? You were a member of this forum during this time.
Nah fella, it was comical because everybody's response to your assessment was hilarious.
A few people acting femanine because they disagree with a post does not equal hilarious.
bebe13junior
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2014
- Messages
- 3,362
- Reaction score
- 627
Feminine you mean? Is this Donald Trump
on here? JOKE. But not happy that you are stereotyping feminine qualities on something trivial.
Listen it's fine. No figure is perfect and you are allowed your own opinions. Let's keep and civil. We already saw what happened because of a recent Civil War....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I guess I did and I own the figure too.
Manannin
Super Freak
That should have just been called 'I-don't-know-how-to-pose-my-toys-gate' The shoulder armour is pretty well articulated on the 45...
Skillerwhale
Super Freak
I guess? In theory? But they were hilarious, so....?
And stop using feminine as an insult. Women are the best, the strongest, the funniest, and the smartest of our species -- they are also our fellow forum members and deserve to be treated with respect. If it were up to me you'd be banned already.
The Green Goblin
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2013
- Messages
- 4,191
- Reaction score
- 1,481
Looks like we've got a male rights activist in here folks...
This guy is back up on pre order at BBTS for anyone that missed out. Just put my pre order in
LexiKon318
Super Freak
SilverStar17
Super Freak
I can't really fault this armor for much, its a great release EXCEPT for the 2000 batteries it takes to light up
Nice to see you still around, Brainiac. Haven't seen you around much lately.
And regarding your post, luckily for me, I couldn't care less about electronic features on my figures.
I personally think neither gender should be put on a pedestal; both are equal from a humanity standpoint and everyone should be treated with respect. Being a certain gender, color, etc shouldn't automatically by default command more respect than anyone else. As you mentioned, we're all here for the same collective reason.
Skillerwhale
Super Freak
Nice to see you still around, Brainiac. Haven't seen you around much lately.
And regarding your post, luckily for me, I couldn't care less about electronic features on my figures.
I personally think neither gender should be put on a pedestal; both are equal from a humanity standpoint and everyone should be treated with respect. Being a certain gender, color, etc shouldn't automatically by default command more respect than anyone else. As you mentioned, we're all here for the same collective reason.
Well cool, but there's a big difference between complementing people VS. putting down an entire gender.
SilverStar17
Super Freak
Of course, absolutely uncalled for. As I mentioned, neither gender should be put on a pedestal and should be treated with respect from a humanity standpoint, not based on gender as far as how much respect you do or don't deserve.
Skillerwhale
Super Freak
Of course, absolutely uncalled for. As I mentioned, neither gender should be put on a pedestal and should be treated with respect from a humanity standpoint, not based on gender as far as how much respect you do or don't deserve.
bebe13junior
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2014
- Messages
- 3,362
- Reaction score
- 627
We shouldn't be bringing any race, gender, colour, sexual preference into this forum. It should be a "safe" place...safe for anyone to come in here, talk about our collecting passion we all have and not be afraid to feel unwelcome because of someone's idea of humour or someone's idea of what's appropriate or not. But it happened, let's move on and go forward positively.
I'll start us off by saying that I am very curious to see if the Stark MK46 head sculpt will fit on the Starboost figure. Hmmm?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'll start us off by saying that I am very curious to see if the Stark MK46 head sculpt will fit on the Starboost figure. Hmmm?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Yeah, I'll admit that the arms could be closer to the body, but I still think it looks great. And you're right it's fairly easy to position them so that the tiny gap isn't visible.
Less than a week for this to start shipping (hopefully). My fingers are crossed hoping that sideshow doesn't take forever to ship like they did with the war machine mk 1.. but the mk 3 went out quickly, so we'll see.
enzolt
Super Freak
We have a mysoginist in here.....
Looking at their post history, they've been consistently negative towards other people too, not just negative comments about figures.
So pathetic...
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Looking at their post history, they've been consistently negative towards other people too, not just negative comments about figures.
So pathetic...
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Too bad for you it's not your personal forum.
What's pathetic is overly emotional members stalking certain other members post and trying derailing every topic they raise. I commented about the way the leg flaps flares out and does not sit flat to the legs like all over Iron Man and a few members spent the last few days making smart comments instead of commenting on the actual issue. It might not be an issue to you but it does not mean what I said does not exist.
Looking forward to this figure even with all of the nerve inducing QC things to look out for. Somewhat guiltily, for all that the colours are innacurate to the palette in the film, I think the choice Hot Toys have opted for makes for a better looking figure on the shelf.
As to the casual use of a gender as an insult up thread? For all that it's a constant minor irritant on this site - honestly I've see worse on here. Like for instance the casual use of soft porn in avatars, siggies, and for companies to make sales on a forum that claims to be family friendly. (And no, I don't mean the neutral shots of the naked figure to accurately show range of motion/anatomy/where joints are placed, but the sexualised shots. It puts me in half a mind to buy one of those ridiculous slave outfits that keep popping up for male phicens and see if photos of that type will draw more criticism when it's a male figure being made to pose provocatively in a ridiculous outfit. But that's another matter entirely... And ridiculously given how my brain makes spurious connections, is it terrible that I'd definitely use a Stark headsculpt in aforementioned theoretical shots? After all, it probably still wouldn't be the worst thing that Pepper had caught him doing)
As to the casual use of a gender as an insult up thread? For all that it's a constant minor irritant on this site - honestly I've see worse on here. Like for instance the casual use of soft porn in avatars, siggies, and for companies to make sales on a forum that claims to be family friendly. (And no, I don't mean the neutral shots of the naked figure to accurately show range of motion/anatomy/where joints are placed, but the sexualised shots. It puts me in half a mind to buy one of those ridiculous slave outfits that keep popping up for male phicens and see if photos of that type will draw more criticism when it's a male figure being made to pose provocatively in a ridiculous outfit. But that's another matter entirely... And ridiculously given how my brain makes spurious connections, is it terrible that I'd definitely use a Stark headsculpt in aforementioned theoretical shots? After all, it probably still wouldn't be the worst thing that Pepper had caught him doing)
Similar threads
