Thanks! I guess the nearly 10k photos I've taken since I got my camera finally paid off.
I use the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT.
Hot Toys - MMS 75 - IRON MAN - 12 inches MARK III full spec and pics
- Thread starter wookster
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
- Status
Thanks! I guess the nearly 10k photos I've taken since I got my camera finally paid off.
I use the Canon EOS Digital Rebel XT.
Radagaster
Trolling the Woods
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2005
- Messages
- 1,669
- Reaction score
- 0
Is the chest area different on the HT compared to the movie? I'll display HT with Stark's head, and display the Koto one as is. They both should be the same scale right? I notice on the SDCC display at SS that there's putty at the bottom of his feet? And I'm confused why they'd need wires going into his thighs. Unless they were to light up the LEDs on his feet???
Memnoch
Lt. Vulture
1. Dont think so. 2. No idea. 3. It's to make sure he stays in that position all Con long. 4. No wires in his thighs I can see, that would be the stand.
Did HT shorten the torso? I think the original version looked like it had 3 sections between the highest part of the hips and the lowest part of the chest. The one at SDCC looks to only have 2.
SOLIDSNAKE
Super Freak
The Mike
In the Pixels
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
- Messages
- 30,612
- Reaction score
- 82
No.
They are both 1/6. Whether they'll look the same next to one another is another question indeed. Remember Medicom calls their figures 1/6 and they are short. DCD also calls theirs 1/6 and they are 13". This is Koto's first attempt in this scale for the Marvel statues so its a wait and see.
Its to hold positioning.
What you are noticing is the new stand which holds at the thigh instead of at the waist.
JustinLuck
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2005
- Messages
- 3,949
- Reaction score
- 0
Could you repost the original pic? He does look a lot better proportion wise compared to what I remember. But it could have just been the camera angle.
I think this was the original pic. I dunno...it still looks like the new version is better proportioned, but the abdomen section looks about the same.
Odowankenobi
Super Freak
No, there was a wire going into the figure at SDCC. Most of us assume it was to power the light up feature so that they didn't have to rely on batteries. It won't be part of the final product.
You would be correct.
zeelhar
The Collector
what would be sweet would be to get mark 2 and get a custom head of terrance howard and make WAR MACHINE
pjam
Here on the Perimeter
I can't belive DSC still has some of these left for only like $150 shipped!
https://store.darkshadowcollectibles.com/000467.html
https://store.darkshadowcollectibles.com/000467.html
I thought HT already had a TH headsculpt on one of their newer military figures?
The Mike
In the Pixels
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
- Messages
- 30,612
- Reaction score
- 82
They do. Also if you are just sticking his head on the Mark 02 and calling it War Machine then you need "Google Search" my friend. Not only is the color scheming off but even the updated War Machine where you would initially go taking the Mark 02 is a completely different make up from even the Extremis suit where the film version was based.
Seriously. Although I do hope for a full Rhodey in military dress from the film.
Speaking of the Mark 02 where are these pics from the confirmed release???
Seriously. Although I do hope for a full Rhodey in military dress from the film.
Speaking of the Mark 02 where are these pics from the confirmed release???
Grange Wallis
Super Freak
We're waiting on those still, Mike... unfortunately! 
JC
Super Freak
Pre-ordered mine today thru Sideshow ...I couldn't believe they haven't sold out yet..Now let's see if SS comes out with their own maquette or PF version...
bearmodel
Super Freak
Is Hot toys going to make a Mark I or Iron Monger one day? That would be awesome...
I'd bet $ on it.
- Status
Similar threads
