spindrift
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2009
- Messages
- 13,328
- Reaction score
- 121
True- I'm kicking myself over not getting Mk 47!!
1/6 Hot Toys - MMS378D17 - The Avengers: Iron Man Mark VI Collectible Figure
- Thread starter Hologram AI
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
True- I'm kicking myself over not getting Mk 47!!
jonathan719
Freakzoid
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2018
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 1
Somebody has Mark 42 or mark 43 to compare the scale please???
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
jonathan719
Freakzoid
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2018
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 1
Oh thanks, perfect.
I just want to see if my mark 43 isn’t too small compare to News mark 6,5.
Envoyé de mon iPhone en utilisant Tapatalk
jonathan719
Freakzoid
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2018
- Messages
- 81
- Reaction score
- 1
Sierra122
Freaked Out
Finally!
Craig Walker
Super Freak
Nice!
gmoney5000
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2015
- Messages
- 4,779
- Reaction score
- 493
Yikes, the Mk. III did not hold up well over the years. Between that gaping shoulder piece and the midgetness of it, I can't see why anyone who doesn't own it now would ever consider getting it.
I really do hope that HT comes out with a 3.0 of it. It would be an absolute buy for many.
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2017
- Messages
- 8,521
- Reaction score
- 5,513
With the upcoming 1/4 version, perchance they'll revisit it? Well, I like the Mark II as much if not more than the III.
Centrocal
Super Freak
Very curious to see if Diecast Mark 2 is same height or taller than Mark 3. I suspect it is taller and thats why they did not show them standing side by side cause they know its gonna p!ss of everyone who bought the Mark 3.
That whole figure is a mulligan. Not only is it short but it didn't benefit from the improved designs most diecast figures have. Limited ankle articulation and then that ridiculous swap out power pose mid section. What is that nonsense?
That whole figure is a mulligan. Not only is it short but it didn't benefit from the improved designs most diecast figures have. Limited ankle articulation and then that ridiculous swap out power pose mid section. What is that nonsense?
blinguskahn
Super Freak
Hahahahaha EXACTLY! I was one of the first to complain about the limited articulation on the DC Mk. III. Yeah the height was wrong but the lack of including the pull down ankles and the static shoulders are what really bothered me. Especially since the Mk. 42 had the pull out shoulder barrels and going as far back as (I think) the original Mk. VII had the pull down ankles. That figure was such a bust. I’m hoping they’ve learned from that debacle and included all the DC and non-DC improvements that have been made over the years with the Mk. II. Even now, I’m surprised when I receive a new IM release (like the Mk. VI) which didn’t have the pull down elbow joints that the Mk. 45 had. Sure, maybe it didn’t need that but it’s an amazing way to get more articulation out of the elbows.
Wow. That Diecast Mark 3 was an embarrassment.
Really wish now that they are doing the 1/4 Mark 3 and Diecast Mark 2 with corrected height,
That they would do a Mark 3 Diecast 2.0 -- correct height, dark maroon armor, etc.
The specs for the 1/4 MK3 shows it at 19 inches and the MK42/43 and 45 at 20 inches. So i think they will always make the 3 a little bit shorter than everything else. The MK2 is taller at 12.20 inches.
Which really doesn't make sense. RDJ did not get shorter from the Mark 2 suit to the Mark 3… it's just stupid
to make ONE suit shorter than all the rest, with no real reason to.
No it doesn't make sense. The Mark 3 is essentially a rebuild of the Mark 2 using a Titanium alloy. It should be exactly the same height.
Similar threads
