1/6 Hot Toys - BvS: Dawn of Justice - Batman

[ShaneSG]

i think after you see the movie, Batfreak, your opinion may change. Batfleck is a savage. He will **** your **** up. It's easy to see why a thug would be terrified of him.

 

[Sewol]

Any Marvel movie gets a collective hard on despite Age of Ultron being trash.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk

This; I can't stand how cheap and 2-dimensional Marvel movies are. One of the main complaints about MoS and BvS is thoughtless collateral damage, yet the exact same sort of damage happens to New York in Avengers 1.

 

[evenflow]

Looks so much better. If i like the movie, I will probably order it.

 

[MedievaL]

The upper body area could do with some more tweaks. The upper chest and shoulders area looks small and underwhelming.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[chobits55]

This batman had enough ********.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Tourist]

that's just my opinion. I know its closer to the comics, and in todays world where the movies tend to be try to literally emulate the comics, I guess you can get away with it. 20 years ago, a suit like this would not have worked. theres a reason why burton and co went with the all black rubber suit. its more how I would imagine batman to be dressing in reality. this movie however is obviously not going for that. its a bit more OTT in its deptiction, but I cant imagine a random thug being totally scared of a guy wheres a mesh grey pajamas. all black is the way to go IMO, but that's just me. still excited to see the movie, but this is probably the weirdest batsuit ive seen. no neck, mouse ears, no underwear, jeez louise! supes and bats have no balance to there suits, its weird not to have the underwear. it is nice that they still have the rubber cowl, and that batman is back to having a black rubber cape. it just looks sooo much better then the big blanket bale wore.

that said, the batmobile is a huge improvement over the tumbler crap, but I still miss the sleek all black roadster from the original movies.

I disagree, I hated the 89 Batsuit back when it came out, I would have loved something like this.
I also think that Batfleck is a lot scarier than Burton's Batman ever was.

 

[elvis1976]

I disagree, I hated the 89 Batsuit back when it came out, I would have loved something like this.
I also think that Batfleck is a lot scarier than Burton's Batman ever was.

Affleck on screen and in the suit is the scariest Batman on screen. Bale was frightening at all and the other not so much.

And it isn't a lycra spandex bodysuit. It is an armoured bodysuit it's just doesn't look like a piece of rubber like the other Batman.

 

[Rex Mason]

This; I can't stand how cheap and 2-dimensional Marvel movies are. One of the main complaints about MoS and BvS is thoughtless collateral damage, yet the exact same sort of damage happens to New York in Avengers 1.

Have you seen the trailer to Civil War? They're addressing that issue. It's what gets the whole conflict rolling...

The difference here is that Man of Steel's Superman would rather hang out with Lois a bit, making sure he gets some action while people are dying all around him. He's not Iron Man. He's the most powerful man on the planet, and his values set his apart from other heroes. But in Man of Steel, he has no interest in saving the people all around him, and is caught up in his own fight. He's better handled in BvS.

 

[Zenjay]

Anyone know if this guy is coupon eligible at SSC yet?

 

[WhoaItsJBot]

I disagree, I hated the 89 Batsuit back when it came out, I would have loved something like this.
I also think that Batfleck is a lot scarier than Burton's Batman ever was.

Yeah, I've always thought Keaton looked like a goofball in the suit, not to mention I generally dislike Tim Burton. Affleck looks powerful and intimidating in the suit. My opinion isn't some cliche "bash the old, praise the new" thing either. I wasn't a Batman fan growing up, so I never had the nostalgic memories for the Keaton films like most fans seem to.

Waiting in the theater right now to see it, only a few minutes left.

 

[Gipetto0812]

ordered it already since day one but love the updated body!

would also love if you guys talking about the movie could discuss in the movie thread and not here :

 

[Sewol]

Have you seen the trailer to Civil War? They're addressing that issue. It's what gets the whole conflict rolling...

The difference here is that Man of Steel's Superman would rather hang out with Lois a bit, making sure he gets some action while people are dying all around him. He's not Iron Man. He's the most powerful man on the planet, and his values set his apart from other heroes. But in Man of Steel, he has no interest in saving the people all around him, and is caught up in his own fight. He's better handled in BvS.

Yeah and I'm glad they finally got round to addressing that. I still can't see Marvel movies as anything but cheap, by-the-numbers set-ups for the next Avengers movie though. This way of handling comic characters is a shame because BvS fell into the same trap in a way. Albeit I found the ten seconds of the Aquaman reveal far more thrilling that any of the Cap or Thor movies.

 

[olbertfrog]

Hoping got chest articulation and bigger shoulders.

 

[Motuxmen]

I see....


And now with your most recent posts...apparently you were so confident they were working on it all along....

Right...

I was addressing his comment about the magazine article. That the article was done up awhile ago and what to expect from the article.


I also didn't say I knew they had done changes to the body, but I did address the idea that it was done in response (meaning not even started) to comments about it after it went up for order. Those are two seperate issues. But you lumped them together.

 

[I Am Toys]

I was waiting to see the film before I decided to pull the trigger on both of them... my only regret was not doing it sooner. This movie did a great job at fan service. Although I understand why the general public may feel wtf.

Missed out on getting the exclusive extras .

You can still order the separate exclusives for each ffigure. Bats still comes with the rifle and Superman with the kryptonite. You just won't get the tech cowl, which I wasn't really interested in anyway, but a free accessory is a free accessory.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[ImABarRoomHero]

Man, I was really hoping I could skip this one. Now it's just not gonna happen. Time to find what else I can sell from my collection....

 

[creasy]

Just seen the film today, awesome & afflecks a real contender for the best batman, he portrayed Bruce Wayne & batman perfectly.
Gonna pick up all 3 and the chrome armour version now, loved it


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[CloudN]

Yeah, I've always thought Keaton looked like a goofball in the suit, not to mention I generally dislike Tim Burton. Affleck looks powerful and intimidating in the suit. My opinion isn't some cliche "bash the old, praise the new" thing either. I wasn't a Batman fan growing up, so I never had the nostalgic memories for the Keaton films like most fans seem to.

Waiting in the theater right now to see it, only a few minutes left.

You guys do know that what you guys are basically saying is - Hollywood made something better 20 years later.
Personally, I like Ben Afflect as Batman. Finally a proper modern update for Batman on screen. None of the flaws Christian Bale had.
However, physical appearance and the fight scenes aside, Ben Affleck didn't surpass Michael Keaton as Batman as the script lacked depth for Batman so there were gaps in Ben Affleck's performance. His motivation doesn't make sense and end up making him look rather dumb sometimes.

 

[franpincho]

You guys do know that what you guys are basically saying is - Hollywood made something better 20 years later.
Personally, I like Ben Afflect as Batman. Finally a proper modern update for Batman on screen. None of the flaws Christian Bale had.
However, physical appearance and the fight scenes aside, Ben Affleck didn't surpass Michael Keaton as Batman as the script lacked depth for Batman so there were gaps in Ben Affleck's performance. His motivation doesn't make sense and end up making him look rather dumb sometimes.

Exactly.


Apple made a better iPhone in 2016 than the one in 2008 doesn't make sense either. It's plain stupid to compare a full blown, 70% of the time CGI Affleck Batman to Keaton. I liked the movie, but those comparisons are dumb.

Affleck was great, but most of that "huge Batman" factor is mostly a puffy suit and lots and lots of CGI.

They all brought something to the table, except Clooney.

 

[Starscream Soundwave]

Affleck was great, but most of that "huge Batman" factor is mostly a puffy suit and lots and lots of CGI.

A human being of that size and build could not move the way he does in real life. Nolan didn't want to take that route in his films and it wouldn't have been possible to pull off back in the Burton days.