Not enough options so I couldn't vote.
I found it to be a leading question. Both are a representative of the actor, a likeness, a resemblance. So both.
Then, onward, one is using, what you are purporting is not a close enough likeness, that it is better than the other, but uses modification of the base non-likeness. So neither.
Then there is no third choice, which would be your version, entirely of your own design, that would, purposedly, indicate a closer resemblance than has been done.
Then how about a computer sculted figure, just to show how technology can still not do justice to the actor or the eye.
Then, of course, the old comparison picture of the actor, by which none would be close enough, whether it be computer sculpted or not.
Am I being difficult? Yes I am. Why? Because I see in you, something in myself, which I do not like. I have no beef with you. The beef is with myself. I strive not to judge, but still do.