Proto, production.
The Official T-800 Comparison Thread
- Thread starter kennykillek
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
MagnumOpus
Super Freak
Ahahahaha, common bro
TheClipperKing
Super Freak
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2010
- Messages
- 779
- Reaction score
- 81
[ame="https://youtu.be/IILvSEeBQaE"]https://youtu.be/IILvSEeBQaE[/ame]Full review now up , please me know if it changes anyones mind about the sculpt
Ahahahaha, common bro
It is the prototype vs. production. The production version has some detail loss from casting and cheaper production paint apps. The same thing you'll be getting on the DX13. If it is not the same sculpt, please feel free to explain why they would resculpt something they just made. The time and money involved makes no sense.
Think of how you are going to lose even more detail by recasting the DX13 sculpt. It will then be a copy of a copy.
Jackhepburn
Super Freak
I have to say, I was expecting another EB vs HT argument... Not a rant about whether or not the DX13 is the same as the DX10.
Personally, I'd say it's the same sculpt, maybe some minor modifications
Personally, I'd say it's the same sculpt, maybe some minor modifications
MagnumOpus
Super Freak
Didn't change the face sculpt of DX10! I remembered a very different Arnold in the proto pictures of DX10
VintijDroidGutzz
Super Freak
^ in that above pic, the one on the right (prod) still reminds me of Benicio Del Damon-negger. 
Devil_666
Super Freak
Anyone who watches TheClipperKing's comparison video and still thinks the MMS William Dafoe on Steroids figure looks more like Arnie in T2 than the DX10 OR DX11 is either legally blind or just blinded by bias.
VintijDroidGutzz
Super Freak
That's what I find interesting; in videos like CK's, he looks excellent.
Conversely, a lot of photos of the head - like the one above I commented on, has an amount of skew to them which is in part, why a lot of folks I imagine were scratching their head as a result.
CK's review is pretty comprehensive though - he does a great job, & the head looks great there.
Conversely, a lot of photos of the head - like the one above I commented on, has an amount of skew to them which is in part, why a lot of folks I imagine were scratching their head as a result.
CK's review is pretty comprehensive though - he does a great job, & the head looks great there.
olbertfrog
Super Freak
Any body comparaison between the dx and previous T800's?
Thanks
Thanks
Didn't change the face sculpt of DX10! I remembered a very different Arnold in the proto pictures of DX10
Yes, the DX10 was revised. That's not even part of the argument. Everyone knows that. The revised DX10 (what you see as the final product) was used for the DX13.
They didn't change the final DX10 for the DX13 prototype. Your previous photo showed you clearly knew what I was talking about before as you posted a comparison between the DX13 and the final DX10.
Let me reiterate: the DX13 is the same sculpt as the DX10. This statement has nothing to do with the proto shots of the scrapped version of the DX10.
MagnumOpus
Super Freak
Ok bro, if you want to believe that, no problem for me But I have eyes
But I have eyes
- Joined
- May 17, 2008
- Messages
- 7,873
- Reaction score
- 1
You can tell DX13 is based off the DX10 sculpt just to me it looks a bit angry, eyes a tad squint...both sculpts are great.
The MMS is strictly my Galleria version now and the DX10 stays as Cyberdyne shoot out version and DX13 i will display full on damage and cycle back to semi-damaged now and again.
The MMS is strictly my Galleria version now and the DX10 stays as Cyberdyne shoot out version and DX13 i will display full on damage and cycle back to semi-damaged now and again.
MagnumOpus
Super Freak
I am agree with you bro
This is fair to say that DX13 is based off the DX10 sculpt but not the same...
Ok bro, if you want to believe that, no problem for me
You changed what you were comparing mid discussion. The DX10 (final version, the prototype of the DX10 was never part of the discussion) is the same sculpt as the DX13. If you disagree, you are being completely illogical.
- Joined
- May 17, 2008
- Messages
- 7,873
- Reaction score
- 1
Its just Yulli's sculpt passed over to K.A Kim who sculpted the battle damage maybe or K.A Kim finished what Yulli started back on DX10 when the proto pics came out..who knows what goes on when they are working on this stuff, all i know is that both DX10 and 13 are great buys and IMO will be better for me then owning the 1/4 Enterbay versions as i hate to display such big figures that take up more room and need custom display cases etc...F that.
I am agree with you bro
Admitted it then played semantics. I rest my case.
galmando
Super Freak
I agree with the comments that some peope are perhaps being bias in their comparisons of the DX and MMS sculpts
Like CK, i think that both have their pro's and cons, and the DX is clearly an improvement on an already excellent sculpt, so i don't feel agreived (sp?) that i don't have the DX
I think of this situation like the Mark I, i missed the first release and so was happy for the re-release, and with T2 it's vice versa - everyone wins
I've got my MMS kitted out with his mini-gun so my eyes are dead set on the battle damaged DX13
Then i'm out
Yeah right
Like CK, i think that both have their pro's and cons, and the DX is clearly an improvement on an already excellent sculpt, so i don't feel agreived (sp?) that i don't have the DX
I think of this situation like the Mark I, i missed the first release and so was happy for the re-release, and with T2 it's vice versa - everyone wins
I've got my MMS kitted out with his mini-gun so my eyes are dead set on the battle damaged DX13
Then i'm out
Yeah right
Jackhepburn
Super Freak
Thought I'd stick my EB kitted out over here too so you's can compare DX10/EB etc
No offense but is that pic warped or something? Arnie looks skinny and his head looks stretched.
Similar threads
