- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 3,048
- Reaction score
- 0
I think a lot of people are going to,lol this could be medicom's first big PPO day at SS.(wonder how many SS is getting)
EVILFACE said:I have registered a name, but there is just too much hate toward SS there. I'd be busy all day long lol
nash said:I disagree Evil, there's no unnecessary hate towards SS on our board. people are openminded there, if something could be improved then it's stated no mater if it's SS, Medi, Takara, or HT. It's probably the most unbiased group of people that Ive ever seen.
nash said:It's a beaten dead horse that sideshow needs to improve on their base bodies. and the lackluster comparisons for some of the proto to production is what people normally don't like.
nash said:I dont see people bashing for no apparant reason.
nash said:Credit is given when due, sorry you don't like people's opinions, but it's true imo that sideshow needs to improve some things as well as everyone else.
nash said:and it is my opinion that when compared to hot toys or takara sideshow is sometimes the lesser. but that doesnt mean that i dont enjoy their products, i just see room for improvement in certain areas.
nash said:Just because myself or others don't see SS as the #1 1/6th figure company Josh, doesn't mean we are "anti-SS". Get over it superfan.
a person who is opposed to a particular practice, party, policy, action, etc.
PosterBoyKelly said:So are we done with this? Because every freaking time a Medi drops, this happens. It's lame as hell. And with this and the Spideys it's all up our butts. I'm gonna say what I dis-like about any company on any board, so long as I can say what I DO like as well. Who cares? All you (you being no one in particular) have to do is say, "I agree/disagree but that's my opinion" blah blah blah.
I'll turn this car around dammit!
Well that’s your opinion like you said,… so just because people don’t agree with your opinion doesn’t mean you label them as anti-ss or unbiased.jlcmsu said:They need to tweak it but I don't think it needs a complete overhaul. It accomplishes the poses I want and from what I can see most poses people want from the movies. I do agree as I said some tweaking could be used. As far as proto to production sure we'd love them to match exactly. There's always gonna be changes though because of many variables.
<o></o>jlcmsu said:I didn't say they where bashing for no reason. They have reasons valid ones because it's their opinion. However, to say it's an unbiased board is not true either. None of these fan boards are unbiased because well have those with us to start.
<o>jlcmsu said:See now this is where it gets personal Nash with the "Get over it superfan" comment. <!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" o:spt="75" oreferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f"> <v:stroke joinstyle="miter"/> <v:formulas> <v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0"/> <v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0"/> <v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1"/> <v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2"/> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth"/> <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight"/> <v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1"/> <v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2"/> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth"/> <v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0"/> <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight"/> <v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0"/> </v:formulas> <vath o:extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" o:connecttype="rect"/> <o:lock v:ext="edit" aspectratio="t"/> </v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" alt="" style='width:12pt; height:12pt'> <v:imagedata src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\Chad\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image001.gif" o:href="https://sideshowcollectors.com/forums/images/smilies/rolleyes.gif"/> </v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->You're taking a shot at me which is not cool. My post was nothing nasty and outlined my opinion. I don't think just because people don't think SS is #1 makes them anti-SS that's another misnomer folks have about me. I read several threads every post and read very few postitive things said about SS. Anti-SS is probably too strong but open minded about SS is too strong as well IMO.
<o></o>jlcmsu said:Just don't go saying their open minded about SS or their unbiased because that's not true either.
nash said:Well that’s your opinion like you said,… so just because people don’t agree with your opinion doesn’t mean you label them as anti-ss or unbiased.
nash said:You shouldn’t be allowed to even compare bias, you’re the most biased person of Sideshow that I’ve ever seen.
nash said:Ive been posting there for over 6 months now, you’ve been there for one day. I really feel you’re trying to pull poo out of your ass just because majority doesn’t see sideshow as the #1 company.
nash said:All of the complaints towards sideshow there are the same freakin ones that are on this site as well. So what’s your point? Even freaks throw negative comments about SS, just look at the damn new legolas thread.
nash said:Is your opinion martial law or something? Who are you to tell me what is true and what is not?
nash said:That was getting personal? You should know me by now, I can get way more personal than that. I didn’t think you took offense to the term superfan, I thought you liked it.
nash said:Well, like loki said, your words really don’t mean much to me anymore, I don’t even know why im replying to you. You like to push the fact that everything you say is “your opinion”, yet you call people anti-ss just because they state their opinions that something needs improving. So I can’t say that Anakin’s lips suck without being anti sideshow?
nash said:I think you just need to get laid and everything will be cool with you.
nash said:sorry but unless at SDCC you’re going to physically make me do it, my opinion stands. I still say there are a lot of unbiased people. Want to know why? Because majority have come from all different places, OSW, MWD, RS, RPF, SSF, SF, etc.