Centurion
Super Freak
Congrats to everyone who got the v2.0 recently.
The Mk.I is truly a multi-media masterpiece.
The Mk.I is truly a multi-media masterpiece.
Hot Toys - MMS168 - Iron Man: 1/6th scale Mark I (2.0)
- Thread starter Lejuan
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
SixthScaleEdward
Super Freak
One of the things I really liked about 2.0 is the tightness of the joints.
Easily stands on its own and no fear of tumbling at all.
Viking Spawn
Super Freak
My original (left) humps over, I can't get it to stand straight up, his knees are weak, and his cheat piece is either too small or sets up to high on his chest exposing his waist. The pants are a different color too. The 2.0 has tighter joints and the chest armor covers his waist very well. The posture on the 2.0 is nice and I don't have any trouble with him standing up, the original wants to take a tumble all the time. The armor is a lot easier to manipulate on the 2.0 too, but the 2.0 helmet doesn't close completely like the original.
I'd have to say the weathering on the original looks better. The armor on the original's (left) back hangs low, and it looks a tiny bit shorter or smaller however you want to look at it.
I think the 2.0 is the better figure, but I will be holding onto the original, it's part of the Ironman set the way I see it.
More cool comparison photos. Thank you.
PoorCollector
Freaked Out
One of the things I really liked about 2.0 is the tightness of the joints.
Easily stands on its own and no fear of tumbling at all.
I must be the odd one out but I prefer him with the mask up, so I have to pick the 2.0 for the headsculpt. That and it guarantees it's MISB.
My original (left) humps over, I can't get it to stand straight up, his knees are weak, and his cheat piece is either too small or sets up to high on his chest exposing his waist. The pants are a different color too. The 2.0 has tighter joints and the chest armor covers his waist very well. The posture on the 2.0 is nice and I don't have any trouble with him standing up, the original wants to take a tumble all the time. The armor is a lot easier to manipulate on the 2.0 too, but the 2.0 helmet doesn't close completely like the original.
I'd have to say the weathering on the original looks better. The armor on the original's (left) back hangs low, and it looks a tiny bit shorter or smaller however you want to look at it.
I think the 2.0 is the better figure, but I will be holding onto the original, it's part of the Ironman set the way I see it.
When you say the original is on the left do you mean 'his' left and our right? Isn't the 2.0 on the left side and the 1.0 on the right side of the picture when looking at it?
My original (left) humps over, I can't get it to stand straight up, his knees are weak, and his cheat piece is either too small or sets up to high on his chest exposing his waist. The pants are a different color too. The 2.0 has tighter joints and the chest armor covers his waist very well. The posture on the 2.0 is nice and I don't have any trouble with him standing up, the original wants to take a tumble all the time. The armor is a lot easier to manipulate on the 2.0 too, but the 2.0 helmet doesn't close completely like the original.
I'd have to say the weathering on the original looks better. The armor on the original's (left) back hangs low, and it looks a tiny bit shorter or smaller however you want to look at it.
I think the 2.0 is the better figure, but I will be holding onto the original, it's part of the Ironman set the way I see it.
Your original's on the right as I see it.
I have no trouble with my 1.0, he has very stiff joints, stomach does not show and does not hunch forward
VoidDweller
Super Freak
My original (left) humps over, I can't get it to stand straight up, his knees are weak, and his cheat piece is either too small or sets up to high on his chest exposing his waist. The pants are a different color too. The 2.0 has tighter joints and the chest armor covers his waist very well. The posture on the 2.0 is nice and I don't have any trouble with him standing up, the original wants to take a tumble all the time. The armor is a lot easier to manipulate on the 2.0 too, but the 2.0 helmet doesn't close completely like the original.
I'd have to say the weathering on the original looks better. The armor on the original's (left) back hangs low, and it looks a tiny bit shorter or smaller however you want to look at it.
I think the 2.0 is the better figure, but I will be holding onto the original, it's part of the Ironman set the way I see it.
I agree on the 1.0 weak joints vs. the 2.0. That's exactly what I noticed when posing mine together without stands. Same goes with the chest armor as you pointed out. It's a toss up for me in regard to the weathering.
zipflint
Super Freak
Lookin' good!
Centurion
Super Freak
Your original's on the right as I see it.
I have no trouble with my 1.0, he has very stiff joints, stomach does not show and does not hunch forward
Yeah, that Mk.I on "our" right looks like the original and mine also doesn't have any issues with showing the stomache. The chest armor comes all the way down over the stomache and to the belt.
Dollmanron
Super Freak
Oops, the new 2.0 is on the left and the original is on the right. Sorry.
I need some opinions...
Does the left eye look off? Should I request a replacement? It's not that bad from a distance.
Also, can someone tell me where this piece goes? It fell from the right arm when I removed the plastic cover.
THANKS!
Does the left eye look off? Should I request a replacement? It's not that bad from a distance.
Also, can someone tell me where this piece goes? It fell from the right arm when I removed the plastic cover.
THANKS!
chRd
Super Freak
noticed the left eye too. if replacement is easy go for it
Slightly...but it could just be the pics. Can't you tell by looking at them with your own eyes?
The hose looks like it's from the yellow cylinder on the right arm.
I always notice things that aren't balanced and "off".
I wanted opinions to see if I was being too nitpicky.
Thanks, I'll check the other pics for the yellow cylinder [Edit: As soon as you pointed it out, I saw it
]
PoorCollector
Freaked Out
Two shots of the ultra cool rocket launcher:
jimmie_dimmick
Super Freak
Liking the photos. The eyes look a bit wonky on your figure as well. Must be pretty common. Dr. Jones looks great in the last photo. No PERS throwing the likeness off.
I'm still looking at picking this up sooner rather than later.
I'm still looking at picking this up sooner rather than later.
DarthTrafford
Super Freak
Great pics everyone!
If the eyes are bothering you,just display it with the mask down.
LOL!
I'm kidding,if it's bothering you I hope Sideshow can help.
I just opened mine and it looks perfect.
Put him together with one question though.
Is the plastic material suppose to come off around the battery compartment?
The instructions make it sound like all you have to do is push the button and the lights work right out of the box,but you have to slide that little plastic strip out first right?
I pulled it out and my batteries went flying LOL!
All the lights work on mine I'm happy.
If the eyes are bothering you,just display it with the mask down.
LOL!
I'm kidding,if it's bothering you I hope Sideshow can help.
I just opened mine and it looks perfect.
Put him together with one question though.
Is the plastic material suppose to come off around the battery compartment?
The instructions make it sound like all you have to do is push the button and the lights work right out of the box,but you have to slide that little plastic strip out first right?
I pulled it out and my batteries went flying LOL!
All the lights work on mine I'm happy.
Similar threads
