All I'm saying is, thats not whats happening there. You're losing a lot of clarity in your shots because of it. Plus more sensitive to movement because of it.
DX 11: Joker 2.0
Last edited:
DX 11: Joker 2.0
What is DOF
All I'm saying is, thats not whats happening there. You're losing a lot of clarity in your shots because of it. Plus more sensitive to movement because of it.
Paying for this figure tomorrow!!! Can't wait to get him. Had the DX01, but this looks superior.
Seriously though, I do understand the initial question. But it is what it is. I can post some iPhone pics. Which IMO are the most unflattering pics out there. Well next to iPad pics anyway.
Now I'm actually confused about my own question.
But while I know you're not going to OMG levels, I just mean your pictures are far better than average, even with the lighting to make the eyes more cavernous.
I guess if you wouldn't mind posting a ****ty iPhone pic, we can call it a day. While I know they're not flattering, I think it's one of those things where I've taken enough phone pics where I can do the mental math. I can think, "Okay that figure looks like that on an iPhone, and I know what my figures look like when I take phone pics, therefore this figure looks like this." Or something. I think my logic has gone off the rails.
Debating whether to get the hair done on it. Either this or the enterbay one.
Paying for this figure tomorrow!!! Can't wait to get him. Had the DX01, but this looks superior.
Is he in UK? Wonder how much it costs? A guy on the Facebook pages does it for £60. Seen pics too. Looks great!
DX 11: Joker 2.0
Now I'm actually confused about my own question.
But while I know you're not going to OMG levels, I just mean your pictures are far better than average, even with the lighting to make the eyes more cavernous.
I guess if you wouldn't mind posting a ****ty iPhone pic, we can call it a day. While I know they're not flattering, I think it's one of those things where I've taken enough phone pics where I can do the mental math. I can think, "Okay that figure looks like that on an iPhone, and I know what my figures look like when I take phone pics, therefore this figure looks like this." Or something. I think my logic has gone off the rails.
OK, this is as bad as I can make it for you, iphone pic, badly exposed standing in detolf. Horrible iphone lens distortion, horrible color cast, no detail on face (although the even exposure shows you the eyelids and fully finctioning PERS.)
(not sure why I'm doing this as it could lose me business, but never let it be said i wasn't honest).
Just to be clear, this isn't just a haired DX11, the face has been changed, resculpted and partially repainted.. And I haven't futzed his hair here.. the cool thing about this method of hair application is that it's pretty futzable, Seb (Elvis) will tell you the same thing. It's pretty sturdy. I have a BobbyC head which I'm terrified to touch, you can actually comb this guy's head (gently).. Jackson included to show how unflattering these pics are.
(this one's a bit brighter)
Enter your email address to join: