tnaig001
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
- Messages
- 2,898
- Reaction score
- 0
Hi. Was originally excited that I was going to get my hands on a 1:1 General Grevious bust today but the sale was botched
The seller (who I later found out, is a member of the forum) then started accusing me of being an insincere buyer who wasted his time.
These are the facts of the matter:
The seller advertised his bust on ebay.sg as being new in box
I emailed the seller and made an offer. He accepted and I also asked if the bust was free from defects. The seller told me the bust was mint.
I then made arrangements to pick up the bust from the seller's residence which was a 2 hour round trip by bus.
On reaching I looked at the bust and it was obvious to me that there was something wrong with the mic on the left side of the grevious bust.
One side was horizontal (as it should be) and the other was raised at about a 30 degree angle.
I pointed this out to the seller who insisted this was normal.
I then looked behind the bust to see where the mic was joined and noticed what appeared to be a break that was glued back.
I proceeded to take out my display LED to verify as it was not bright enough to see clearly (it was approx 6.30pm).
Seller insisted it was not a break even though it could be seen that it was.
I told the seller i had to reconsider as the bust was defective. I did not accuse the seller of being dishonest. I just stated the facts - the bust was defective and i had to reconsider.
So i left the place and then got an offer for a reduced price. I told the seller that i would only pay US$390 (original agreed price was $465) if the bust was defective as i would then have to pay someone to fix it for me.
The seller has now been texting me accusing me of being unethical for wasting his time and not buying the bust as agreed upon. He believes it is unethical for a buyer to back out once a deal has been struck, despite the fact the bust is defective.
I'm tired of arguing and thought perhaps the rest can weigh in so we can get an unbiased opinion.
sorry for the wall of text.
The seller (who I later found out, is a member of the forum) then started accusing me of being an insincere buyer who wasted his time.
These are the facts of the matter:
The seller advertised his bust on ebay.sg as being new in box
I emailed the seller and made an offer. He accepted and I also asked if the bust was free from defects. The seller told me the bust was mint.
I then made arrangements to pick up the bust from the seller's residence which was a 2 hour round trip by bus.
On reaching I looked at the bust and it was obvious to me that there was something wrong with the mic on the left side of the grevious bust.
One side was horizontal (as it should be) and the other was raised at about a 30 degree angle.
I pointed this out to the seller who insisted this was normal.
I then looked behind the bust to see where the mic was joined and noticed what appeared to be a break that was glued back.
I proceeded to take out my display LED to verify as it was not bright enough to see clearly (it was approx 6.30pm).
Seller insisted it was not a break even though it could be seen that it was.
I told the seller i had to reconsider as the bust was defective. I did not accuse the seller of being dishonest. I just stated the facts - the bust was defective and i had to reconsider.
So i left the place and then got an offer for a reduced price. I told the seller that i would only pay US$390 (original agreed price was $465) if the bust was defective as i would then have to pay someone to fix it for me.
The seller has now been texting me accusing me of being unethical for wasting his time and not buying the bust as agreed upon. He believes it is unethical for a buyer to back out once a deal has been struck, despite the fact the bust is defective.
I'm tired of arguing and thought perhaps the rest can weigh in so we can get an unbiased opinion.
sorry for the wall of text.