EVILFACE
Super Freak
snip .
My post was in response to the creator of this thread.
But anyway, to your post, the Cobra Commander in this movie looks like ^^^^ and backstory leading up to becoming CC is stupid. I don't care how he is acted.
snip .
You're using "everyone" as if the entire viewing audience of a film is familiar with the source material and a fan. That's just not the case. There will be countless people who have no clue what G.I. Joe is who will go and see this piece of crap and think it's awesome. That's just how it is. Most people who have no idea what G.I. Joe is will see this because 1) The action looks cool to them and/or 2) There's a particular actor in it they like. Simple.
really so there's footage out of cobra commander speaking and acting?
thenammagazine said:Replace "everyone" with "any real G.I. Joe fan with an ounce of self respect" and you'll get what he meant.
ortiz344 said:...but if it sucks ,looks ridiculous and is nothing like the CC any real G.I. Joe fan with an ounce of self respect was wanting/expecting...?
Same response. Same point.
You're using "any real G.I. Joe fan with an ounce of self respect" as if the entire viewing audience of a film is familiar with the source material and a fan. That's just not the case. There will be countless people who have no clue what G.I. Joe is who will go and see this piece of crap and think it's awesome. That's just how it is. Most people who have no idea what G.I. Joe is will see this because 1) The action looks cool to them and/or 2) There's a particular actor in it they like. Simple.
"any real G.I. Joe fan with an ounce of self respect"
caca cobra commander
wtf were they thinking?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
My post was in response to the creator of this thread.
But anyway, to your post, the Cobra Commander in this movie looks like ^^^^ and backstory leading up to becoming CC is stupid. I don't care how he is acted.
And I think he looks quite awesome. I've heard enough of the he looks like ^^^^, he doesn't have a hood, etc. ad nauseam by now and I agree the backstory is ridiculous and it would be awful if he had no dialogue, but are you really saying that aesthetic infidelity is worse than an accurate character portrayal?
Take for example V, hugo weaving was pretty good and gave some good moments to an otherwise terrible adaptation. It'd be silly to say that because it pooed on the source material that weaving's acting didn't matter. I'm simply hoping for some nice moments from a talented actor in what will no doubt be at minimum a disappointing film. As a Joe fan, I want to keep open minded. Tis all.
All find and dandy.....but seriously....CC looks like ^^^^.
And I think he looks quite awesome. I've heard enough of the he looks like ^^^^, he doesn't have a hood, etc. ad nauseam by now and I agree the backstory is ridiculous and it would be awful if he had no dialogue, but are you really saying that aesthetic infidelity is worse than an accurate character portrayal?
Take for example V, hugo weaving was pretty good and gave some good moments to an otherwise terrible adaptation. It'd be silly to say that because it pooed on the source material that weaving's acting didn't matter. I'm simply hoping for some nice moments from a talented actor in what will no doubt be at minimum a disappointing film. As a Joe fan, I want to keep open minded. Tis all.
Personally, as a movie producer or even an investor, I would've rather risked my millions on a surefire bet of only appealing to hardcore fans (the franchise is a million dollar franchise - if not a billion dollar one), than pissing off the target audience (remember, everybody involved has said they're making it "for the fans") and hoping to get new converts based on a silly burned wannabe freddy with a plastic see-through scrotum over his head. They're pulling a Street Fighter all the way with this colostomy bag of a movie. And I'll happily watch as it sinks faster than a meat turd at the box office. I'll honestly be surprised if it makes back it's budget on the theatrical release.
And I think he looks quite awesome. I've heard enough of the he looks like ^^^^, he doesn't have a hood, etc. ad nauseam by now and I agree the backstory is ridiculous and it would be awful if he had no dialogue, but are you really saying that aesthetic infidelity is worse than an accurate character portrayal?
Take for example V, hugo weaving was pretty good and gave some good moments to an otherwise terrible adaptation. It'd be silly to say that because it pooed on the source material that weaving's acting didn't matter. I'm simply hoping for some nice moments from a talented actor in what will no doubt be at minimum a disappointing film. As a Joe fan, I want to keep open minded. Tis all.
Agreed 100% I'm just stating the reality of it.
Lol. It's Wolverine Origins all over again
Not really. Despite the story being flat, Wolverine was still Wolverine. Now if the movie had been called "X-Men Origins: Deadpool," that comment would be more valid, because what they did to Deadpool (aka Weapon XI) is pretty much what they're doing to G.I. Joe.
Enter your email address to join: