**16k**
Super Freak
I don't see why? I like your reviews. They're fast and to the point, not dragging for hours on the box before finally showing the figure! You get my vote anyway!
Learning how to pose figures well is a plus, but is not a must to be a good reviewer, IMO. If so, I would tell comic reviewers to know how to draw first.
Michael Crawford, if I'm not mistaken, also claims that he is not a good futzer/poser. But he's among the top reviewers.
I look forward to seeing how the articulation goes, what to take care of, what issues we should watch out for, how the paint is done, how the tailoring was executed in mass production, to name a few. To pose it well is for the collector to do. Besides, these people are reviewing, not really advertising.
And why try to be happy and as hyped as any fan if the reviewer isn't, objectively? If I may say so, those are traits that make people dislike Sean Long, for everything is awesome in his end.
Yes, I think yours are ones of the more professional looking reviews. No offense to the styles of others, but some videos seem to be more about the reviewer than the item. I really don't have time for those videos. Yours are concise and are about what's important - the product.
That's where I disagree with you Highlander.
I think posing isn't and shouldn't be an issue. Most of us will just use a museum pose. A good review should just show the figure as it is out of the box. If it looks good out of the box, then it's a good figure. If it requires fancy posing and lighting to make it look good, then it's bad!
Clearly, here, we seem to have the second option...
Enter your email address to join: