NYC Seriously?

Advertise with us
One sixth kit
shop deals on amazon
Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
BadMoon

BadMoon

Demi G0D Overseer
Joined
Sep 13, 2006
Messages
26,685
Reaction score
2
Location
Sighişoara
Bye bye freedom! :slap :flag

No more super-sized Cokes. Forget about stomach-busting 64-ounce sodas at KFC. Even 20-ounce Snapples are on Mayor Bloomberg’s latest heath-conscious hit list.

New York City plans to ban the sale of large sodas and other sugary drinks in an effort to combat obesity.

The proposed first-in-the-nation ban would impose a 16-ounce limit on the size of sweetened drinks sold at restaurants, movie theaters, sports venues and street carts. It would apply to bottled drinks as well as fountain sodas.

The ban, which could take effect as soon as March, wouldn't apply to diet sodas, fruit juices, dairy-based drinks or alcoholic beverages.

Mayor Michael Bloomberg said Wednesday that he "thinks it's what the public wants the mayor to do."
Click to expand...
 
If it were what the 'public' (whoever that word is supposed to represent) wanted to do, why would he have to pass a law forcing them to do it?

What a pig.
 
devilof76 said:
If it were what the 'public' (whoever that word is supposed to represent) wanted to do, why would he have to pass a law forcing them to do it?

What a pig.
Click to expand...

Exactly. This is scary ____ IMO. What's next?

Hopefully their citizens don't appreciate being told what is good for them and stand up to this nonesense.
 
From what I hear the restriction of super size is the least of the US problems. I haven't been there but apparently your takeaway meals are massive compared to here, but you should have the choice to restrict yourselves and not be forced
 
shocktrooper_au said:
From what I hear the restriction of super size is the least of the US problems. I haven't been there but apparently your takeaway meals are massive compared to here, but you should have the choice to restrict yourselves and not be forced
Click to expand...

Thats exactly it. Although I do think it would be assery if we could force Kim haircuts on all males. Shaved sides and no sideburns for the win! :yess::lol
 
Most of the problems in this country can be reduced to the same thing as this: fascists who think they know better than the rest of us how to live our lives (which they don't really consider to be ours) passing laws that hold a gun to the head of anyone who doesn't bow in awe of their superior wisdom.
 
devilof76 said:
Most of the problems in this country can be reduced to the same thing as this: fascists who think they know better than the rest of us how to live our lives (which they don't really consider to be ours) passing laws that hold a gun to the head of anyone who doesn't bow in awe of their superior wisdom.
Click to expand...

One of the most disgusting things I saw recently was on a trip my wife and I took to NYC. We took a cab to the trade center memorial. We were greeted to barricades, and then told to come back tomorrow. Not only that but that we would have to purchase tickets to get in. That's right, we couldn't even see what they have done with the memorial so far bacause it was all blocked off. :flag
 
BadMoon said:
One of the most disgusting things I saw recently was on a trip my wife and I took to NYC. We took a cab to the trade center memorial. We were greeted to barricades, and then told to come back tomorrow. Not only that but that we would have to purchase tickets to get in. That's right, we couldn't even see what they have done with the memorial so far bacause it was all blocked off. :flag
Click to expand...

I'm starting to think that New York is what's wrong with this country. For the longest time I thought the only thing wrong with them was the Yankess.

And Columbia University. And Eliot Spitzer. And...no, I'll stop.
 
This is just going too far. And stupid because what's to stop someone from just buying two or more 16oz drinks?

shocktrooper_au said:
From what I hear the restriction of super size is the least of the US problems. I haven't been there but apparently your takeaway meals are massive compared to here, but you should have the choice to restrict yourselves and not be forced
Click to expand...

We must have a bad reputation then because I looked at the McDonald's menu for Australia and compared it to the US and the calories are about the same.
Mcd's Large french fries:
US: 500 calories
AU: 453.8 calories (conversion from KJ)
Mcd's Big Mac:
US: 550 calories
AU: 492 calories (conversion from KJ)
Mcd's Large Coke:
US: 310
AU: 223 calories (conversion from KJ)

That's what's in the largest Extra Value Meal here in the US.
I also get the feeling that the McDonald's calories are rounded up for their US menu just to be safe, either that or the calorie converter I used is off.
The US versions are a little higher, but not by much, I certainly wouldn't say they're massive by comparison.
 
You hippies will only get the freedom we allow you to have and LIKE IT! :lecture
baseballbat.gif
:wave
 
I personally would like to be told when to go pee pee and poo poo.

Until that happens lets keep banning stuff. :flag
 
Wow, let's restrict the size of a soda you can buy, but you can still go buy a carton of smokes. Some people got their priorities all out of order.
 
I also think that grocery stores should be eliminated as well. That way once a month the government can send us what they decide is okay to eat.
 
I'll tell you all what...after the courts ruled to drop some of the charges against a man who was viewing child pornography on the internet simple because he did not download the pics and didn't know the thumbnails were being stored on his computer...nothing surprises me coming from New York any more.
 
sprig0701 said:
Wow, let's restrict the size of a soda you can buy, but you can still go buy a carton of smokes. Some people got their priorities all out of order.
Click to expand...

They make way too much money bilking the tobacco companies to restrict it any more than it already is. Between taxes and the state lawsuits from the late 90's, they know they have too much to gain from people continuing to get sick and/or die.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top