He was down by contact back at the line of scrimmage. They didn't review the whole play. Gotta take it when you can get it, but I still hate even if it goes for my team. The actual fumble was too close to tell. Even if it was called a fumble I can't see how it could've been overturned. One of those "not enough visual evidence" calls.
NFL Thread
- Thread starter Mithrandier
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
He was down by contact back at the line of scrimmage. They didn't review the whole play. Gotta take it when you can get it, but I still hate even if it goes for my team. The actual fumble was too close to tell. Even if it was called a fumble I can't see how it could've been overturned. One of those "not enough visual evidence" calls.
Ahh I just saw the end part, not seeing the full game. Chargers got it under control its red zone channel time.
Yeah, that's a one way beating in SD.
SixMillionDollarMan Guy
Super Freak
Well, on this horrible football day at least San Diego is winning. 
Darth Cruel
Super Freak
The product is better, the way it is, now. It is reminiscent of 70's football. And I have missed that.
SixMillionDollarMan Guy
Super Freak
Raiders looking pathetic as always! Oh well.. At least they can relish in the fact that KC is the worst.
Yup, Looks like another season of Denver and SD battling for the AFC West!
See post #17307.
By the way, get a bigger sig why don't you.
SixMillionDollarMan Guy
Super Freak
I thought you were banned?
316what
The Real Vic Mackey
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2005
- Messages
- 5,277
- Reaction score
- 3
The Pats are the shame of the NFL this week followed closely by any team that loses to the Dolphins.
I fully expected Oakland to lose to Miami today. For some reason playing in Miami is kryptonite for Oakland.
316what
The Real Vic Mackey
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2005
- Messages
- 5,277
- Reaction score
- 3
Raiders looking pathetic as always! Oh well.. At least they can relish in the fact that KC is the worst.
Yup, Looks like another season of Denver and SD battling for the AFC West!
Actually it was Denver and Oakland battling for the AFC West last year.
Actually it was Denver and Oakland battling for the AFC West last year.
Then how did the Raiders end up 3rd?
He should get banned off of horrible spelling/grammar alone. I feel dumber for having read his post.
SixMillionDollarMan Guy
Super Freak
..
This week came through for sprig's short term wish. Baltimore and New England lost, and Pittsburgh won. Now Brady needs to continue his regular season perfection against Thug-imore, and Pittsburgh just needs a W out west in Oakland. I'm not guaranteeing anything. The Steelers played like crap last trip out there, and Baltimore is always a tough out after a loss.
And props to Philly's D. Their offense commits, what?, 5 turnovers, and all that kept Baltimore in that game was 2 long FGs. That's a tough D. If their offense learns ball control, look out entire NFC.
And props to Philly's D. Their offense commits, what?, 5 turnovers, and all that kept Baltimore in that game was 2 long FGs. That's a tough D. If their offense learns ball control, look out entire NFC.
316what
The Real Vic Mackey
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2005
- Messages
- 5,277
- Reaction score
- 3
The Raiders did not end up in 3rd last year. The Chargers did. Denver won in Week 17 and Oakland lost in Week 17, but Denver had the first tiebreaker.
AFC West
Denver Broncos 8 8 0 .500
Oakland Raiders 8 8 0 .500
San Diego Chargers 8 8 0 .500
Kansas City Chiefs 7 9 0 .438
Actually it was Denver and Oakland battling for the AFC West last year.
Oakland was lucky, SD was struggling last year. Otherwise it's pretty much business as usual for Oakland since They lost the SB.
The successful era of Rich Gannon is pretty much gone in Oakland. Oakland needs a quality type coach like gruden again! Otherwise just move back to L.A.
Pretty bad and embarassing when you lose to a green and I do mean green rookie in Miami.
Similar threads
