New Quantam of Solace trailer....

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I would have to say that Die Another Day is the worst Bond film, followed by Diamonds are Forever. I wonder why that is? :) I enjoy parts of both films and they are fun if you're in the right mood, but they're bottom of the barrel. View to a Kill and Moonraker I find enjoyable, especially the latter. As silly as it is, it's still quite epic, funny, and beautiful to look at. Ken Adam's sets are marvelous in that one.
 
Last edited:
That is a pretty cool commercial, doesn't make me want to drink it though. If I'm going to drink a soda I'm going to drink a real soda. :lol Coke Zero just isn't the kind of product I would associate with James Bond. Of course its not really a drink I associate with NASCAR either, but they changed the Pepsi 400 to the Coke Zero 400 this past year. :lol
 
Coke Zero was first marketed as bloke Coke though and James Bond is seen as quite a blokey thing, so I guess that's what they were going for. I recently went on a crash diet and had to replace regular Coke with Coke Zero and I've gotta admit I have gotten used to it and don't mind it so much now. Still hate Diet Coke though.
 
Hmm, my initial reaction is about the same as my initial reaction to Madonna's Die Another Day, don't care too much for it, but its not too bad. Maybe it'll grow on me like that one did. It's disappointing after the last one, I really love You Know My Name, ranks as one of my favorites.
 
Its my favorite. I do like A View to A Kill and Live And Let Die a ton....almost as much as YKMN.
 
You Know My Name is great. This new one I don't care for at all. Maybe with the title sequence it'll have more impact on me.
 
Live and Let Die is awesome. I also enjoy The Living Daylights alot. I like the line, "Living's in the way you die" just seems so Bondish.
 
I think my big disappointment in the series is that when I heard they were doing Casino Royale I really wanted to see Bond's first mission, but set in the 50's and being against SMERSH.


That wouldn't work at all. The early Bond films are set in the 60's because they were MADE in the 60's. They're contemporary films set in whatever year/decade they happen to be made. Bond is timeless, like Batman. Doing a period Bond film would be completely against the grain.

I can't pick a side in the great Bond debate. I love all of them, for very different reasons.
 
Personally I don't feel like it would be going against the grain anymore so than the series currently is.
 
The last movies before CR seemed to have been taking in too much grain.
 
Back
Top