Search results

Just one reason I didn't like this Conan at all. It could be argued that these types of movies, are only as strong as the villains cast in them. And if you look at the three Conan Movies made, there is some evidence to support this. 1982: Thulsa Doom (James Earl Jones) - Compelling...

I've never even finished watching Momoa's Conan the Barbarian. DVD Player committed Suicide halfway through, I kid you not. Bland performance. Bad story. Weak SFX. And an uncompelling villain. That's what I got before giving up on it.

Guess that explains the delay then. A proper update on what's going on won't be unappreciated however.

If you mean the 1982 version, so do I: Conan the Barbarian (1982): 8/10 Conan the Destroyer (1984): 5/10 The first one for me I love for a few reasons. The musical score of Basil Poledouris being a big one. Crafting a composition that really does feel as if it had been made from a time...

They'll come when they're ready. One thing I wonder about is the process behind making these models. The designs, rough models, the various steps taken in the work. And I'm hoping that Chronicle 3DA is able/willing to answer this.

Same here. Conan may have had few lines in the first one, and the acting was largely unpolished, but there was something about that that made it work for me. Probably because they (Arnie and Sandahl) had been chosen for their athletic ability as opposed to acting ability. I like Conan the...

Well you got my interest here. By Temple Doom, you mean the robed version, correct? I'd like to see the Snake Head on that but can see why it'd be skipped for the Armoured Doom - good luck fitting the helmet on that particular head! :lol: I guess James Earl Jones really is that good an...