Hot Toys – MMS132 - Iron Man 2: Mark VI full spec and pics
- Thread starter Devil_666
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Seems it is based on a deleted scene (where Stark lets Widow try on a gauntlet), so that is understandable.
villainsfan42
Super Freak
same stark head...original, hot toys, reallllyyy original.
otherwise, the figure looks amazing.
otherwise, the figure looks amazing.
kairus
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2009
- Messages
- 1,349
- Reaction score
- 4
vareika, thank you for posting those!
I'm not seeing hardly any use of the torso articulation in those photos; I wonder why that is, especially when the same publication really showed off the incredible poses the Mark IV was capable of capturing. That has me worried that the same abdominal articulation is not included in the Mark VI.
Secondly, would anyone who can read those care to share what it says?
i think he has to have the same articulation. because its the same body
maybey they felt they didnt have to show articulation that much for mark 6 because it was done already for mark4, and focused on the battle damage look.
The Mike
In the Pixels
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2006
- Messages
- 30,612
- Reaction score
- 82
Points one and points two are exciting point three is a bummer. C'mon RDJ it is a freaking toy.
Most likely its a publicist or some other kind of representation dealing with the merchandising aspect. I seriously doubt RDJ is looking at a figure and saying no, look at the HS with the Mark III or the half sculpt with the Mark II or Mark I or even the Mech suit? They are all different and if someone was being that rough with their likeness they'd want them all the same.
Why his representatives are being hardassed on the Mark IV and VI sculpts who knows but I'm sure if deadlines hit we'll just get the Mark III HS with new sunglasses on the Mark IV and the Mark II HS reworked for the Mark VI.
Biojex
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2008
- Messages
- 23,668
- Reaction score
- 142
It's cool that they have the triangle arc reactor in there.
<object width="640" height="385"><param name="movie" value="https://www.youtube.com/v/rlIfPTdrvVM&hl=en_US&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="https://www.youtube.com/v/rlIfPTdrvVM&hl=en_US&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="640" height="385"></embed></object>
VI looks great .. Bruce looks like he should not be on display yet..
VI looks great .. Bruce looks like he should not be on display yet..
Last edited:
LChinoz
Super Freak
Is that the same RDJ sculpt as the BD Mk III? Just with some scars?
bandito
Super Freak
Something thats kinda bugging me is the arc reactor doesn't quite line up with the window on the chest piece.
Was it like this in the movie?
Restated many times: ArcReactor is not Chest RT.... even the movie prop designers/prop makers use the wrong term on the Videos.
Pic. 05 (below) is the 1/4 Mk.5 bust.... all the rest of the pics show the semi-circle through the window of the 12".
Last edited:
Will we be able to make a complete mint undamaged MK 6 without burns from this figure or do all of the parts have scorch marks?
Spiderwebb13
Super Freak
Its not gonna be completely clean with the "clean" parts. It wont look all destroyed, but will have a used look to it.
xkage824
Super Freak
similar to the battle damaged mark 3
xkage824
Super Freak
do what i did get both
Dang i can't decide which one to po mk vi is the latest and greatest but the mk iv comes with donuts! Agh what do you all think should i get the iv or the vi?
Can anyone ever really say no to doughnuts?
tigerknight
Super Freak
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 381
- Reaction score
- 0
Similar threads
