he is a famous"Hollywood" geek, there aren't that many of those actually (Vin Diesel is another one believe it or not)
Star Wars: The Force Awakens (12/18/15)
- Thread starter Khev
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
he is a famous"Hollywood" geek, there aren't that many of those actually (Vin Diesel is another one believe it or not)
Well, he needs to get the money from somewhere.
I agree with him that the prequels are ***t but this same guy lashed out at Star Trek fans who don't like the Abrams movies. One rule for a Star Wars fan, another for Trekkies.
abstractharmony
Super Freak
Simon Pegg is a whiney little Crotchgoblin.
His entire career is based on his 'Geek' sensibility but the problem is that he just isn't. I honestly at tiems feel like the kid the Emperors New Clothes with him.
Slapworthy!
His entire career is based on his 'Geek' sensibility but the problem is that he just isn't. I honestly at tiems feel like the kid the Emperors New Clothes with him.
Slapworthy!
Python
Super Freak
I like him and I assume those comments were very much taken out of context for a lazy sensational headline. But on the off chance it is not, it is a very silly thing to say, he's essentially alienating a large portion of his audience.
The Clown Prince of Crime
Super Freak
Yeah, I wouldn't even begrudge him for that, except his specific argument undercuts anyone being able to support the new Trek films:
If we shouldn't respect people who like films that misunderstand the source material, or that go against the approach of the creator (Gene Roddenberry in the Trek-verse) then a hell of a lot of disrespect should be flying his way. And mine to be honest. Because I enjoyed the first Abrams Star Trek film even though it had only the most cosmetic of connections with the original series' and films. They were straight ahead action movies, which Star Trek has never been.
Yet he dismissed complaints from Star Trek fans using expletives as I recall.
I put Star Trek Into Darkness right down there with The Final Frontier. I think it's an embarrassing film for the franchise and would happily see it expunged from canon. And though initially I enjoyed the first film I have to say STID even retroactively soured me on that one.
Also, with how he publicly denounces the prequels and the way he mentions Lucas like that I'm amazed he has any involvement with the new films. I doubt Lucas would approve (if he knows about Pegg and what he has openly said)
The Clown Prince of Crime
Super Freak
Prime Clone
Super Freak
I like the prequels *and* Into Darkness. Guess I'm just easy to please.
My thoughts on Into Darkness parallel yours. My guess is that Pegg just isn't a Star Trek fan, so when he was involved in a Trek movie that was closer to Star Wars than Star Trek, he thought it was just great. And there's nothing wrong with that, unless you're going to say what he said about prequel fans
Yet he dismissed complaints from Star Trek fans using expletives as I recall.
I put Star Trek Into Darkness right down there with The Final Frontier. I think it's an embarrassing film for the franchise and would happily see it expunged from canon. And though initially I enjoyed the first film I have to say STID even retroactively soured me on that one.
Also, with how he publicly denounces the prequels and the way he mentions Lucas like that I'm amazed he has any involvement with the new films. I doubt Lucas would approve (if he knows about Pegg and what he has openly said)
Well I would put the quality of the ST reboots a bit higher then PT. Acting is at least far better.
Having said that STID is pretty bad. I don't like it at all. I still feel it's better then any of the PT but it deserves some slamming for sure.
Yet he dismissed complaints from Star Trek fans using expletives as I recall.
I put Star Trek Into Darkness right down there with The Final Frontier. I think it's an embarrassing film for the franchise and would happily see it expunged from canon. And though initially I enjoyed the first film I have to say STID even retroactively soured me on that one.
Also, with how he publicly denounces the prequels and the way he mentions Lucas like that I'm amazed he has any involvement with the new films. I doubt Lucas would approve (if he knows about Pegg and what he has openly said)
STID has not ruined my enjoyment of the first film thank goodness.
slackerboy
Super Freak
Yet he dismissed complaints from Star Trek fans using expletives as I recall.
I put Star Trek Into Darkness right down there with The Final Frontier. I think it's an embarrassing film for the franchise and would happily see it expunged from canon. And though initially I enjoyed the first film I have to say STID even retroactively soured me on that one.
Also, with how he publicly denounces the prequels and the way he mentions Lucas like that I'm amazed he has any involvement with the new films. I doubt Lucas would approve (if he knows about Pegg and what he has openly said)
Great minds think alike!
I was ok with the fist film creating an alternate timeline and giving free reign to whatever new things they wanted to do with the old crew...until they did STID. A whole new universe to play with and all they could do was rehash original Trek. It was pathetic.
Python
Super Freak
Same here, I love the first, but into darkness was pretty abysmal in most regards. I'd say all three Star Wars prequels are way better than STID personally.
Prime Clone
Super Freak
Well Pegg wrote Star Trek Beyond so he can show everyone how it's done!
cmiller99
Super Freak
Pegg is hypocritical in regard to Trek hate vs. War hate. Hopefully he'll write a really good script for ST3 though.
Similar threads
