Love this pic!
wookster said:It sometimes seems that people have discussed this garment more than the meaning of life itself, and have got apoplectic when others disagree with how it should be!
Should it have two tails, three tails, four tails… should the lining be red, rust, orange, should it be bigger, smaller, bluer, purpler, longer, shorter, thicker, thinner, cleaner or dirtier!!!
wookster said:The front also has an engraved metallic plaque, it has a sticky tape cover to protect it from scratches, but once this is removed its mirror glossy. The support clips into the back edge and is of the ‘crotch hammock’ variety, but you’ll get both figures to stand just fine on the base without it
It was sent to me by HT, a few other reviewers and other bloggers got them as well. It seems there are someting between 10 and 20 in existence.Wookster,may I ask where you got the evidence bag?
Quick question wookster: How come your base looks different? Yours seems to have a sticker or something for the name plate..
great review as always, but I must say, in the comparison pics, I think the BRJ head is just a lot better than this new one, and it is in the eyes. the PERS is a great feature, but, its obviously not perfected yet
Is there a reason why there is no shots of the back of the head? I have a hunch its a very ugly seam where his hair comes off.
the eye rolling system looks good to me but i dont like his head to much. the BR one had a better likeness i think
Nice review mate. I agree i still like BR head more than this one, and it IS in the eyes. They seem too wide and big eyed. Esp since Heath put on that whole squint/fainted out/half closed/crazy eye man thing throughout the film, and naturally had medium to small eyes, i feel the Pers eyes are just WAY too big and not shaped properly. There's something that is just off with it. It looks mad, but it doesn't look like Heath
Enter your email address to join: