InArt - The Batman 1/6th Figure

The Green Goblin said:

I'm guessing it's a licensing thing where they don't want to make it seem like they're selling directly to a different region.

Click to expand...

Hologram AI said:

I do wonder how licensing works when it comes to western reviewers. Might indeed be them trying to work around it and not get into trouble. No idea how that stuff is behind the scenes. Wouldn't INART sending the figure directly to Justin/Jedha be against licensing since they're not in countries the license falls under? Unless if it doesn't work that way.

Click to expand...

Wow…thanks for the knowledge drop

Legit Hadn’t crossed my mind. If InArt sent it directly to their respective locations, that does appear to be a violation or breach of contract.

Couldn’t the YTers just not reveal where they received their items?

EDIT-also, if they didn’t pay for the items, that should be the loop hole in this region exclusivity deal.

Wor-Gar said:

I hope you'll post your best futzed figure so that I don't have to slog through all the bad photos knowing you have already found the best one.

Click to expand...

Black's pics are a great start

01010011antiago said:

Why would InArt want that?

As someone studying marketing, it seriously puzzles me. It makes InArt look like they're trying to put their hands in their reviews. I understand Justin is taking a bit longer because they're shipping something to him so he can complete his review.

Click to expand...

My best guess is they have some kind of agreement with Justin. They want him to be a brand ambassador of sort. They sent him the figure early, but there was a problem. They didn't want him to get screwed being last, so they're trying to coordinate things between him and Jedha to keep things fair, until that "package" arrives.

If this is the case,

A. It's stupid
B. It's concerning

Bleah said:

View attachment 698841

Click to expand...

Perfect

Damn the HT cowl just looks goofy now.

dominishin said:

Damn the HT cowl just looks goofy now.

View attachment 698897

Click to expand...

Both look bad. Both of them don't look like Pattinson if we are being honest

Nope.

Wow. That looks incredible. I really don't see how anyone could be dissatisfied with this.

Justin's lighting is so bad

nm.ct said:

Justin's lighting is so bad

Click to expand...

Not gonna watch his video but I just know he has the figures lit from only the sides. Probably with the middle front section, arguably the most important part, of the figure in darkness and shadow.

Oh brother..

Yeah. That's the figure.

So, is it just excess fabric to allow more motion or is the arm underneath really very thin? I didn't listen to the whole 1 hour video and just jumped to some sections.

bk9196 said:

Both look bad. Both of them don't look like Pattinson if we are being honest

Click to expand...

I am afraid I agree with you... Waiting though for both to see in person.

mitraheroe said:

I am afraid I agree with you... Waiting though for both to see in person.

Click to expand...

Yes. Inart is the better figure, but that cowl face plate and the beak nose bothers me. Have to pose accordingly to hide it.

Batsignal is too good

Trying to decide if I should sell my Hot Toys now or keep them both and decide once I have them both in hand myself

It's not just that Justin uses lights that are too heavy, it's that he also lights everything from below as well.
Do you want a person to look absolutely terrible on film or video? Light them from below.
This is why people use reflectors; they allow you to lighten up the shadows on a person's face, without blowing out all the details.