Statue BLITZWAY- Enter the Dragon- Bruce Lee Tribute 1/3 scale Statue Ver. 2 spec

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I think the pants are still blue,but the shot is pale/dim.i can see the face/pec cuts but I'm sure the abs are replaced with the leg cuts?(interesting that)
perhaps the grizzly bear took this photo for a keepsake:lol
 
lol, it all makes sense in the end

BrucePaw.jpg
 
nooo not pooh bear:lol
anyway after looking at my EB HD1001/1002/1003 the under chin is fully sculpted then joined at the neck for a better(not perfect) fit.
why blitzway didn't go this route rather than sculpt a bit if chin on the neck of the statue is very strange.doing it that way would(and is) giving some issues with the join.the texture of the sculpt and lack of on the neck is not helping either,front on it's fine,but anyone wanting an ''angled'' display may have to rethink.
I keep forgetting to ask you guys who own this...are the shoulder cuts,sculpted.painted.decals.crayon.felt tip pen.:lol.
 
Last edited:
You're welcome mate, and I had a feeling you would say that, lol. To be honest it is fairly plane, even in person but doesn't look bad at all (to me anyway). Still has a realistic skin tone to it that has to be seen in person to really see it properly, as there is subtle shading that is hard to capture on cam, but it is subtle and probably won't be up to your standards. IMO, I think it looks fine as is, and even without the accentuated shading the pant job still looks more realistic than most of Sideshow's human statues, due to the translucency of the material and paints used. Just feels like the paint has depth. It doesn't look cartoon-ish like most of Sideshow's statues.

Yeah but practically any paint job looks better than Sideshow statues, for me to want this piece it has to be mind blowing and even look good in candid shots like Bruce Lo's do. Your pictures are the only pictures I have seen where the statue doesn't look bad, which I think is more to do with lighting and your high quality camera, rather than the paint job. That being said, I think the blush on the knuckles looks great and I still can see some tones through it but it just doesn't blow me away.

Although it's not 100% what you'll see in person, the pics are fairly close, so if you're not happy with what you see in the pics in terms of the colour then you probably won't be happy with it in person either.

Well I like the color of it.

IMO it definitely looks better in hand, but knowing how you are and after reading your comments, I don't think you'd be happy with it.

Probably not but I just wish I could see this in hand! :gah:
 
I think you'd need to see this in hand 1st steve,I don't think that unless your convinced about what you see in the photo's is what you'd be happy with and(due to the ill-fitting head/possible lean issue),then your best keeping the funds until you do.myself I'm more concerned about all the little issues with it,which I now believe will need sorting as I'm not 100% happy how he'd display.
 
I think the join is better than how Enterbay did it on HD-1002 and HD-1003.
The way Blitzway has done it, it is only visible from some angles. The way Enterbay did it, its clearly visible at all angles.
 
maybe.but it didn't need the extra lip of the neck to sit on,as if it's not flush like xplosive's it looks really ugly,and would need sorting if you got one like that.had blitzway carried on with the stubble/shading on the head under the chin and upto the neck,it would have blended in better,not just a dead stop to clearly see different colours/textures.IMO
 
nooo not pooh bear:lol
anyway after looking at my EB HD1001/1002/1003 the under chin is fully sculpted then joined at the neck for a better(not perfect) fit.
why blitzway didn't go this route rather than sculpt a bit if chin on the neck of the statue is very strange.doing it that way would(and is) giving some issues with the join.the texture of the sculpt and lack of on the neck is not helping either,front on it's fine,but anyone wanting an ''angled'' display may have to rethink.
I keep forgetting to ask you guys who own this...are the shoulder cuts,sculpted.painted.decals.crayon.felt tip pen.:lol.

It still looks OK on angles (I'm looking at mine on an angle right now), but it will largely depend on how flush your sculpt will sit with the neck. One side of mine sits perfect and from a distance, it disappears and I can't see it. The other side however, does not sit 100% and is also what's creating the step under the chin, which ruins the side profile for me. Because that side doesn't sit flush however, the join looks more obvious. I think also because of the way he is tilting his head down on that side, it creates a bit of a shadow which is making the join more obvious for some reason.

How you light up this piece also makes a difference in how obvious the seam looks. If you light it from above, even if you don't use LED spot lights over your statues like I do, just normal room lighting from above, makes it less obvious because the face cases a shadow over the neck area, which hides the neck seam a bit. Putting it into a cabinet with LED lights pretty much makes the seam invisible.

I think if you were really fussy, you could apply a very thin strip of putty/filler along the seam, just enough to fill the seam and wipe way the rest, and then paint it up.

Oddly enough, despite all the little flaws and niggles with this piece, I still love it and I'm still wowed by it. I think it's just the overall wow factor. Normally I'm really fussy and if a piece has several flaws like this, I'm put off and can't enjoy it, but with this, I still love it enough to overlook the flaws. As long as I get a replacement piece with a sculpt that sits flush, I'll be happy for the most part, but will still attempt to fix the bits I'm not happy with.

Yeah but practically any paint job looks better than Sideshow statues, for me to want this piece it has to be mind blowing and even look good in candid shots like Bruce Lo's do. Your pictures are the only pictures I have seen where the statue doesn't look bad, which I think is more to do with lighting and your high quality camera, rather than the paint job. That being said, I think the blush on the knuckles looks great and I still can see some tones through it but it just doesn't blow me away.

Well not really. There aren't many statue companies out there doing movie statues really, and Sideshow has put out some nicely painted (but not very realistic) statues.

I'm probably in the minority here, but I do not see the difference in Bruce Lo's repaint. with the exception of the cuts, it honestly looks like the same statue. Perhaps a slightly different skin tone, maybe.

You probably have an unrealistic expectation of this if you're expecting it to be mind blowing to be honest (no offense). Rarely do I see any mass produced statue/bust/figure that blows me away. All the ones that seem mind blowing to me are customs. The Cinemaquette ones look mind blowing, but their likeness blows, and they cost more than double what this statue costs. I do not think this Bruce Lee statue is mind blowing, but I do think it's nice enough to make me want it, personally.

I just don't think this piece photographs well with a poor camera, which is why it looks bad in every other shot but mine. I don't know what it is and I can only put it down to the materials used, but even some 1/6 and 1/4 figures look horrible when photographed using a poor quality camera. They come out looking flat and cartoonish. I think the only figure I've seen that looks awesome in just about any photo I've seen is Enterbay's Battle Damaged T800. You just can't take a bad photo of it lol.

Lighting and a good quality camera helps, but it can only really reveal what is there. I think it's really how you can tell if a piece is actually good or not, because a poorly painted piece will still look bad even with a good camera and lighting (it will just look better than the 'crappy' pics, but will still look bad). My latest shots aren't really using any trickery or fancy lighting. I'm just using the normal lights in my room. All I really did was adjust the white balance on the camera to get rid of any yellow tinge from the lights, so that the colours appear more neutral.


Well I like the color of it.

Well that's good then lol. Was starting to think you were really hard to impress! :lol




Probably not but I just wish I could see this in hand! :gah:

Pop have one in their store now, on display I think (I know this because they opened one for me to check if it had a fault that mine had, so they can swap it, but they emailed me today saying the store took that one and they will open another one for me). If you feel like a trip down to Melb, come check it out lol.

Like I said though, I've tried to make this look as good as possible in my pictures, and also tried to provide some pics that were a bit more realistic in terms of what you'll get in hand so that people aren't misled by my 'fancy' photos, so if you still aren't keen based on what you see in the pics then chances are you probably won't be happy with it in person either. Just my honest opinion.

I still think it's worth a look in person though, just so you 'know for sure', if you know what I mean. So you're not wondering about it. Just depends on how keen you are to check it out, as it's a long way to travel.
 
I think you'd need to see this in hand 1st steve,I don't think that unless your convinced about what you see in the photo's is what you'd be happy with and(due to the ill-fitting head/possible lean issue),then your best keeping the funds until you do.myself I'm more concerned about all the little issues with it,which I now believe will need sorting as I'm not 100% happy how he'd display.

Yeah maybe but I really like the head sculpt.


Well not really. There aren't many statue companies out there doing movie statues really, and Sideshow has put out some nicely painted (but not very realistic) statues.

I was only talking about their realistic ones.

I'm probably in the minority here, but I do not see the difference in Bruce Lo's repaint. with the exception of the cuts, it honestly looks like the same statue. Perhaps a slightly different skin tone, maybe.

I use to think that Bruce Los didn't look much different until I compared the stock paint one to it. The color of the flesh is more accurate and it just has noticeable tones through it, and his pics are poor quality. Looks very realistic IMO, whereas this one doesn't except in the high quality pictures you took in certain lighting. That being said, it doesn't look bad though.

You probably have an unrealistic expectation of this if you're expecting it to be mind blowing to be honest (no offense). Rarely do I see any mass produced statue/bust/figure that blows me away. All the ones that seem mind blowing to me are customs. The Cinemaquette ones look mind blowing, but their likeness blows, and they cost more than double what this statue costs. I do not think this Bruce Lee statue is mind blowing, but I do think it's nice enough to make me want it, personally.

No what I meant was for me to be shell out nearly a 1 K without hesitation, it would have to be something I can not resist. I have the GOD statue, so I know not to expect much from Blitzway as far as paint is concerned, so I was just talking in general that this statue would have to blow my mind in order for me to part with 1 k. That being said I am sure this looks fine or decent or perhaps quite good in real life but I doubt it would be good enough that I could not resist it.

I just don't think this piece photographs well with a poor camera, which is why it looks bad in every other shot but mine. I don't know what it is and I can only put it down to the materials used, but even some 1/6 and 1/4 figures look horrible when photographed using a poor quality camera. They come out looking flat and cartoonish. I think the only figure I've seen that looks awesome in just about any photo I've seen is Enterbay's Battle Damaged T800. You just can't take a bad photo of it lol.

Probably because of the translucently.

Lighting and a good quality camera helps, but it can only really reveal what is there. I think it's really how you can tell if a piece is actually good or not, because a poorly painted piece will still look bad even with a good camera and lighting (it will just look better than the 'crappy' pics, but will still look bad).

Yeah if it is poorly painted no matter how good the lighting is it will look horrible. This is obviously not poorly painted but it still has a plane looking paint job.

My latest shots aren't really using any trickery or fancy lighting. I'm just using the normal lights in my room. All I really did was adjust the white balance on the camera to get rid of any yellow tinge from the lights, so that the colours appear more neutral.

Yes and in those pictures the paint job looks really plane but the high quality picture of the product makes the statue look amazing as the image is very sharp. However, those other ones you used that Tyderium did a photoshop of look quite realistic because of the lighting.




Well that's good then lol. Was starting to think you were really hard to impress! :lol

It's not really about me being so hard to impress, it is about me finding it hard to part with 1 k and other factors are involved to like space etc. I don't really like big things because there is not much space to put them and the boxes also take up too much room to, and thus, I end up with too much clutter. So it would have to be something I can't resist in order for me to ignore all those factors and buy it, if that makes sense?






Pop have one in their store now, on display I think (I know this because they opened one for me to check if it had a fault that mine had, so they can swap it, but they emailed me today saying the store took that one and they will open another one for me). If you feel like a trip down to Melb, come check it out lol.

I am surprized you took yours back, the jaw line is the last thing that bothers me about this piece. I would be more concerned if it was like nongshim's one that is leaning like moon walker (another Sideshow statue trade mark).

Like I said though, I've tried to make this look as good as possible in my pictures, and also tried to provide some pics that were a bit more realistic in terms of what you'll get in hand so that people aren't misled by my 'fancy' photos, so if you still aren't keen based on what you see in the pics then chances are you probably won't be happy with it in person either. Just my honest opinion.

In all fairness, your photos do make this piece look tempting, despite that the paint job still looks too plane for my taste.

I still think it's worth a look in person though, just so you 'know for sure', if you know what I mean. So you're not wondering about it. Just depends on how keen you are to check it out, as it's a long way to travel.

Yeah that's not going to happen.
 
Probably not but I just wish I could see this in hand! :gah:

Me too mate.

Yeah maybe but I really like the head sculpt.

Something I wonder will be lucked out again on another ETD piece even if that piece hypothetically has everything else perfect.
It's usually the likeness that sucks on otherwise nice figures/statues.
The pose is also great on this and probably a one off.

I use to think that Bruce Los didn't look much different until I compared the stock paint one to it. The color of the flesh is more accurate and it just has noticeable tones through it, and his pics are poor quality. Looks very realistic IMO, whereas this one doesn't except in the high quality pictures you took in certain lighting. That being said, it doesn't look bad though.

I've been studying Bruce Lo's pics again... and to be honest I kind of felt this from the start...I'm not sure he has repainted the body apart from embellishing the cuts. The paint still looks fairly even in his shots and I see the same subtle pink tones in his also present in xplOsive's pics - they are just less prominent because of the strategic lighting. He can correct me if I'm wrong but I think xplOsive has lit his shots (along with a stylistic aesthetic), to gain maximum musculature definition and maybe some of the more subtle shading and colour differences in the skin tone you see in Bruce Lo's pics are being sacrificed somewhat.

11007734_1553819918229068_5965603291972081895_n_zpsnwkrlcjk.jpg

10417472_1553819954895731_1520409769147903067_n_zpsfczyhua0.jpg


These really look like the same to me as what you are seeing in the less shadowed versions of xplOsive's pics. The skin tone is still fairly flat with some subtle pink accents that are coming through because the piece is more thoroughly lit. I really think it's coming down to lighting and the fact we are dealing with a translucent resin that is absorbing or reflecting light differently in every shot and every environment. And it should be said, for low quality pics, Bruce Lo's do look much better than most of the other phone camera pics we've seen but I feel it's more of a jag with the lighting. The lens pointing up from that angle in his shots could also be having an affect on the exposure off the skin and how it is being represented. I think it would also look (unfairly and misrepresented) a flat yellow in a different room, under different lights and with a different camera even. So maybe Lo's low grade pics are, by way of fluke, actually showing off the paint job in its truest sense to anything else we've seen rather than him repainting the thing. Just my opinion. Maybe he could confirm all this anyway?

The flat yellow paint in each camera phone pic actually wasn't bothering me as much as the cartoon version of Bruce we were looking at in a structural sense.
XplOsive's shots are the first to show the thing undistorted and correctly proportioned. This is mutually exclusive to any lighting set up or correct skin tone.


It's not really about me being so hard to impress, it is about me finding it hard to part with 1 k and other factors are involved to like space etc. I don't really like big things because there is not much space to put them and the boxes also take up too much room to, and thus, I end up with too much clutter. So it would have to be something I can't resist in order for me to ignore all those factors and buy it, if that makes sense?

Yeah I'm in the same boat here. Although, the great likeness and pose are tempering longings for perfect paint jobs etc, which probably won't happen on future releases either and the price will be higher no doubt. It's actually gone up to $1100 at PC for this version.
 
Got my shipping notice hopefully once it gets here I'll try to take some good pictures, will do my best guys.
 
Yeah maybe but I really like the head sculpt.

Yeah I love the head sculpt on this. It's so life like. Great head sculpts are always my priority on collectables, along with the pose (if it's a statue). It's probably why I persisted with this and stuck to my order.


I was only talking about their realistic ones.

Ah ok.

I use to think that Bruce Los didn't look much different until I compared the stock paint one to it. The color of the flesh is more accurate and it just has noticeable tones through it, and his pics are poor quality. Looks very realistic IMO, whereas this one doesn't except in the high quality pictures you took in certain lighting. That being said, it doesn't look bad though.

I just don't see it. I looked at the pics closely for a long time, then looked at mine, then looked at Bruce Lo's again, and compared to what I see in real life. I just don't see the noticeable tones, or any noticeable difference at all. It looks largely flat to me. It just doesn't look yellow like the early shots, that's all. Has a more realistic skin tone to it, but I think it looks that way in real life, and in my pictures, personally. Viewing this in natural light, it pretty much looks like it does in Bruce Lo's pics. Has a very pinkish tone to it. If someone posted that up and did not mention it was repainted, I would have just assumed it was a pic of a standard one.

Also, seeing this in real life, I really don't see why anyone would do a full repaint on it. Short of adding some more accentuated shading in certain areas (which really comes down to personal preference as I actually think it looks fine the way it is), I actually think the paint is fantastic. Using what appears to be a translucent base with layered translucent colours, I think they've achieved a fairly realistic skin tone on this. Painting over the top of it would take away a bit of the realism I think, as you'd lose the transparency and thus, would end up with something that looks solid and a little fake-looking, unless you were a very skilled artist. Part of the reason PVC head sculpts look so real is due to the translucency of the material.

Just to add, this statue does not look translucent, in the sense that it doesn't look see-through, but if you know what you're looking at you can tell there is some translucency to the material as there is depth to the paint. It has a similar effect to PVC headsculpts that you see on Hot Toys/Enterbay head sculpts, and their bodies for that matter. It just looks totally different when I compare this to my human Sideshow statues.

The sculpt on the body is a little soft in comparison to the proto. I think if it was a little more chiselled, you would end up with more noticeable shading in the muscles simply due to the cuts that would be more defined. Look at some of the proto pics and look at them carefully. You will notice that the skin tone is also largely a single tone with very subtle hues through it, and the majority of the shading comes from the muscles being so clearly defined.



No what I meant was for me to be shell out nearly a 1 K without hesitation, it would have to be something I can not resist. I have the GOD statue, so I know not to expect much from Blitzway as far as paint is concerned, so I was just talking in general that this statue would have to blow my mind in order for me to part with 1 k. That being said I am sure this looks fine or decent or perhaps quite good in real life but I doubt it would be good enough that I could not resist it.

This I totally understand. If you remember, I had a hard time making the decision to buy GoD due to the price, as up until that point, it would have been the most expensive collectible I would have bought, and I had a hard time parting with nearly 600 bucks for Enterbay's T800. I ended up passing once Pop bumped it up to 900 bucks, even though I loved the way it looked. I just didn't like it enough to pay 900 bucks for it.

Buying the Predator statue from AD changed my mentality regarding price though, but I also think it played a part in me buying GoD as I had just spent over 1k buying that statue (which I totally ended up regretting). But it did condition me to pay higher prices for collectables, and I've since PO'd stuff that was well over 500 bucks, whereas previously most of my stuff was under 500.

Simply put, you have to really want this piece to pay 1k for it. It's a hell of a lot of money, and if this was more of a 'that looks kind of cool, wouldn't mind having it' kind of statue, I doubt I would have bought it. Not for that price. There's not many pieces I would pay 1k for, regardless what it is. it's just too much money. These days I do not buy much at all, unless I really love the movie or character, as the prices of collectibles are getting out of hand, whilst the quality has either remained the same, or dropped. A Bruce Lee from Enter The Dragon is just so iconic though, and something I've wanted in my collection for a long time. An epic 1/3 statue was pretty much a no brainer for me, and this pretty much satisfies my need for a Bruce Lee piece in my collection. The guy is a legend and there is no better way to represent him in collectible form.

If I was in your position and had the GoD statue already, it would make it that much harder for me to buy this, and I would have a hard time justifying it. Having no Bruce Lee collectibles whatsoever though, made it much easier for me to make the decision to grab this.



Probably because of the translucently.

That's what I was thinking as well.



Yeah if it is poorly painted no matter how good the lighting is it will look horrible. This is obviously not poorly painted but it still has a plane looking paint job.

It is fairly plain, but the subtlety in the shading works well, almost in it's favour. It really is something you have to see in person, in proper lighting to understand. Even then, opinions vary and you may not like it or see it the same way I do, but I just think with the realistic skin effect they've achieved (for polystone anyway), that the plain look to the paint job is not really an issue. In natural light, there is enough subtle use of blush in the right spots to give the paint some depth, without being overdone to the point where it looks like he's been airbrushed. Real skin does not have accentuated tones and is also fairly plain in colour, so I think they've done a decent job of capturing this.

If the paintjob was plain AND had an unrealistic skin tone to it (like some of Sideshow's pieces), then I would say it is an issue and does not look good. I think Sideshow do this to make up for their lack of realistic tones on their statue, and I do like the effect for the most part, but it does make the piece look fake to me.



Yes and in those pictures the paint job looks really plane but the high quality picture of the product makes the statue look amazing as the image is very sharp. However, those other ones you used that Tyderium did a photoshop of look quite realistic because of the lighting.

Can't remember which pics you were referring to here, but yeah, due to the way the statue is made, it can look realistic or not so realistic depending on the lighting environment, similar to what happens with 1/6 and 1/4 figures from Hot Toys/Enterbay (in poor lighting they just look like cheap toys).






It's not really about me being so hard to impress, it is about me finding it hard to part with 1 k and other factors are involved to like space etc. I don't really like big things because there is not much space to put them and the boxes also take up too much room to, and thus, I end up with too much clutter. So it would have to be something I can't resist in order for me to ignore all those factors and buy it, if that makes sense?

Yeah I get ya. Sounds like you're trying to find enough reason to buy this, and to be honest if I was feeling that way I'd probably pass on it. I kind of felt that way about the GoD piece, and ultimately passed on it. You're a bigger BL fan than me though, so you may be feeling more strongly towards this than I was with GoD, and thus, have a harder time saying no to this. You could always pick it up, decide which one you want more then sell the other one?

The box on this is huge by the way. I had a pretty hard time getting it into my car. Luckily for me boxes are not an issue at the moment, as I have them all stored in my garage. There's quite a few of them, so I think if I didn't have this space available to me, it would have been a real problem.


I am surprized you took yours back, the jaw line is the last thing that bothers me about this piece. I would be more concerned if it was like nongshim's one that is leaning like moon walker (another Sideshow statue trade mark).

The jawline is not really an issue as it's on all of them, but it's more the bit under the chin where it doesn't meet the neck flush. I didn't really notice it badly until I set up the statue in a different part of the room for photos, and filled the room with natural light. Saw it whilst sitting on my couch, and then it was all I could see. It really ruins the side profile so viewing from an angle is a real eyesore as it stood out like a sore thumb, and I'm pretty fussy in that regard (as you know:lol).

Would you not have returned it because of that issue? Do you think I should have taken their $100 credit and kept the statue? I did think about it, but with my OCD, I wasn't sure I could live with the piece. I was in 2 minds about it, but when I shared the photos here and everyone was horrified and felt the same way I did about it, it kind of reaffirmed my decision to take it back. Something I didn't want to have to do because the rest of the piece was fine.

In all fairness, your photos do make this piece look tempting, despite that the paint job still looks too plane for my taste.

Good to know you liked my photos at least and that they had some effect on you in terms of making you want this piece after you were so disappointed with it, lol. The paintjob will come down to personal taste, so if it's not to your liking that's fine.

Yeah that's not going to happen.

Didn't think so :lol
 
I think there are things we all like about this statue along with the things that put a bit of a downer on it also.i myself when GOD came up was gobsmacked at the cost(the EB HD1008) was my most expensive piece ($360) so it was a big jump in price.i felt the expression was a bit blank and the headsculpt was a bit chubby,but took the plunge and I'm very pleased I did.
this ETD statue would no doubt have been the ultimate BL statue had it ended up looking like the proto,or in it's final form done correctly.
I've no issues with the likeness(best to date)the paint seems fine to me,it's the little finishing touches like the sweat.cuts etc,which IMO bring it down.
I wont regret getting this(cost me next to nothing)but if I was not totally convinced then I'd pass,it's a big layout for something that's so iconic that's not quite right(unless you have the skills to sort it).
for those who have this:clap
for those getting this in the next couple of weeks,i hope your pleased..really pleased.
 
Back
Top