Ralph Lauren fires 120lb model for being too fat.

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

The Mike

In the Pixels
Joined
Feb 3, 2006
Messages
30,612
Reaction score
82
Was the photoshopped Ralph Lauren model fired for being overweight?

Last week Ralph Lauren came under fire for (what looked to be) an extremely altered photo of a model in one of its ads. Bloggers at the website BoingBoing.net posted the image online, and lawyers for Ralph Lauren attempted to sue them for copyright infringement. Unfortunately for Ralph Lauren, this only furthered public interest and outrage over the dangerously thin looking model and, eventually, the clothing company released this apology:

"For over 42 years we have built a brand based on quality and integrity. After further investigation, we have learned that we are responsible for the poor imaging and retouching that resulted in a very distorted image of a woman's body. We have addressed the problem and going forward will take every precaution to ensure that the caliber of our artwork represents our brand appropriately."

The Photo:

ralphbloodylauren.jpg


Unfortunately,"addressing the problem" may have included firing the model, 23-year-old Filippa Hamilton. She is 5'10" and weighs 120 pounds--clearly more full-bodied than the photoshopped girl we see in the advertisement. Though Hamilton has modeled for Ralph Lauren since she was 15, the company let her go "as a result of her inability to meet the obligations under her contract with us." But the story gets worse: Hamilton says she was let go because she'd become too fat to model for them. "They fired me because they said I was overweight and I couldn't fit in their clothes anymore," she explained. "I was shocked to see that super skinny girl with my face...It's very sad, I think, that Ralph Lauren could do something like that."


Filippa Hamilton in a past Ralph Lauren ad:
ralph-lauren.jpg


Most of us know that a tall, young woman who weighs 120 pounds is not overweight. But Hamilton claims Ralph Lauren was dissatisfied with her body, and therefore fired her six months ago. However, the company continued to use her image, whittling down her arms, waist, thighs, and possibly several other body parts in the above ad. If they were so unhappy with how she looked, why not get another model for the campaign? Why use the photos and alter and distort them?

Today, Ralph Lauren himself is distancing himself from the ad, claiming, "The image in question was mistakenly released and used in a department store in Japan and was not the approved image which ran in the U.S." So we're confused. They say the photoshopping was an error, that Hamilton is "beautiful and healthy," yet they allegedly fired her for her size? With all these apologies and statements it sounds like the brand still has yet to accept responsibility for their actions.
 
the first pic of her (the photoshopped one) look ridiculous.She looks like a bubblehead.


Unfortunately ,In this age, this industry is run by gay men who wants women to look like skinny boys and this is what the real women must look up to....:monkey4
 
The average size of women is 14. When are these idiots gonna buy a clue?

Even at 5'10" 120 pounds she's really too thin, but way better than that top pic!
 
The title of the thread is just as sensationalistic as the story itself.

It starts off factually, then suggests a possible assumption as fact. She wasn't fired for being too fat, but rather, overweight. Over the weight stated in her contract. Then they state that she said something, which wasn't written between quotation marks, followed by what she did actually say, between quotation marks. Another distortion of the truth. Who wrote this garbage? Some nimrod that can't work out that they kept on using her image because they paid for them. Finally the writer passes their own judgement saying "the brand still has yet to accept responsibility for their actions."

Sour grapes. Crap editorial.

290v9sx.jpg
 
the first pic of her (the photoshopped one) look ridiculous.She looks like a bubblehead.


Unfortunately ,In this age, this industry is run by gay men who wants women to look like skinny boys and this is what the real women must look up to....:monkey4

Well said Shai, well said.
 
the first pic of her (the photoshopped one) look ridiculous.She looks like a bubblehead.


Unfortunately ,In this age, this industry is run by gay men who wants women to look like skinny boys and this is what the real women must look up to....:monkey4

Well said Shai, well said.

It's women and men, both gay and straight alike, who do this to girls. It's disgusting and wrong no matter who does this to them.
 
It can't be Michael Jackson day everyday!

:rotfl:rotfl:rotfl:rotfl

I thought it interesting to post this in retrospect to the thread that was active a while back about the Frankenstein's Bride with the curvy hips and big booty and the conversation that went on in there. Ween's article is actually the same article I found but it interesting to see that the fashion industry would photoshop a pic like the one they did and think that no one would notice or care...
 
"Too thin is to Thin
Too Fat is to Fat
Just right is just right!!"
From the book of Avfin
Avfin
 
I have never met a guy that likes anorexic women :dunno I still don't know why ads on TV seem to assume that men prefer underweight women, and that there is so much pressure on women to be so thin and underweight. There is absolutely nothin wrong with a women with some booty! It should be encouraged more imo
 
It's women and men, both gay and straight alike, who do this to girls. It's disgusting and wrong no matter who does this to them.

This is correct, can't single out Gay men for this.I had a few ex's that had horrible mothers, always telling them they could lose weight when they were just fine and healthy, i think some mothers are real hard on their daughters for this kind of thing.
 
Was the photoshopped Ralph Lauren model fired for being overweight?

Last week Ralph Lauren came under fire for (what looked to be) an extremely altered photo of a model in one of its ads. Bloggers at the website BoingBoing.net posted the image online, and lawyers for Ralph Lauren attempted to sue them for copyright infringement. Unfortunately for Ralph Lauren, this only furthered public interest and outrage over the dangerously thin looking model and, eventually, the clothing company released this apology:

"For over 42 years we have built a brand based on quality and integrity. After further investigation, we have learned that we are responsible for the poor imaging and retouching that resulted in a very distorted image of a woman's body. We have addressed the problem and going forward will take every precaution to ensure that the caliber of our artwork represents our brand appropriately."

The Photo:

ralphbloodylauren.jpg


Unfortunately,"addressing the problem" may have included firing the model, 23-year-old Filippa Hamilton. She is 5'10" and weighs 120 pounds--clearly more full-bodied than the photoshopped girl we see in the advertisement. Though Hamilton has modeled for Ralph Lauren since she was 15, the company let her go "as a result of her inability to meet the obligations under her contract with us." But the story gets worse: Hamilton says she was let go because she'd become too fat to model for them. "They fired me because they said I was overweight and I couldn't fit in their clothes anymore," she explained. "I was shocked to see that super skinny girl with my face...It's very sad, I think, that Ralph Lauren could do something like that."


Filippa Hamilton in a past Ralph Lauren ad:
ralph-lauren.jpg


Most of us know that a tall, young woman who weighs 120 pounds is not overweight. But Hamilton claims Ralph Lauren was dissatisfied with her body, and therefore fired her six months ago. However, the company continued to use her image, whittling down her arms, waist, thighs, and possibly several other body parts in the above ad. If they were so unhappy with how she looked, why not get another model for the campaign? Why use the photos and alter and distort them?

Today, Ralph Lauren himself is distancing himself from the ad, claiming, "The image in question was mistakenly released and used in a department store in Japan and was not the approved image which ran in the U.S." So we're confused. They say the photoshopping was an error, that Hamilton is "beautiful and healthy," yet they allegedly fired her for her size? With all these apologies and statements it sounds like the brand still has yet to accept responsibility for their actions.

That is NO WOMAN! :monkey4 I like hips and butt and boobs. :D
 
WOW!....am I late or what!?

Look, guys! Sheeet like this happens everyday if you work in the fashion industry. The girl is size 6. Typical models are size 4 down. Sample clothes are size 4 down. A fashion house usually hire models who can fit in their clothes when doing a campaign. Sad but true....I do agree the photoshopped images reeks of amateurish talent but the ads were distributed mostly in Asia and those people don't know any better.:D.....Sic a white person in front of asians and trust me, my people will praise them like gods!:rotfl
 
Back
Top