Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (March 24th, 2016)

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Uncanny Web-Slinger said:

His enemies would be distracted by his junk flapping in the wind. It's not like kicking in the ghoulies will hurt him

Click to expand...

Unless Wonder Woman kicks him in his b**** of steel

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

She'd cut his ****.

It's a tendency, apparently.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

GasparZizou said:

She'd cut his ****.

It's a tendency, apparently.

Click to expand...

Yup, she's a total *****

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

The Clown Prince of Crime said:

Yup, she's a total *****

Click to expand...

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

RRJdesign said:

No, not at all. A 13-year old boy's opinion does not affect me at all. I was just curious why people hated you and now I know why.

Thank you.

Oh, and by the way, stay away from rubber.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

You sure get mad over an opinion on a movie that has not been released yet. LOL.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

RIDDICK said:

[

Click to expand...

Reminds me of this

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

A brighter image of Affleck's cowl.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Too bad they took a step back with the one piece cowl where Batman can't turn his head.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

It might be a soft rubber than enables him to turn

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

a-dev said:

And common sense should also dictate that capes be done away with. Symbolism is all well and good but they are a potential hazard and hindrance when it comes to practicality in crime fighting.

Click to expand...

Yeah, well. Why not just ditch the whole unrealistic superhero thing altogether and make them regular detectives or policemen.

We should be embracing lycra, crazy outfits and outside pants. Otherwise what's the point.

For a while back Hollywoods answer to translating any superhero to the screen was:
(A) Darken all the colours until they are nearly black.
(B) Make everything from leather or rubber. Lots of piping and zips, they make it more believable.

Y'know, that's more realistic.

****ingyawn.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Yeah - what is realism, but merely the denial of the source material?

Discuss..

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Lol at this point still nobody has defended the lack of briefs with the word "realism".

Besides. There are no more briefs in the source material anymore either.

I sure hope to see these same complaints against costumes that make sense with the Marvel movies





Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Rorywan said:

Yeah, well. Why not just ditch the whole unrealistic superhero thing altogether and make them regular detectives or policemen.

We should be embracing lycra, crazy outfits and outside pants. Otherwise what's the point.

For a while back Hollywoods answer to translating any superhero to the screen was:
(A) Darken all the colours until they are nearly black.
(B) Make everything from leather or rubber. Lots of piping and zips, they make it more believable.

Y'know, that's more realistic.

****ingyawn.

Click to expand...

Exactly. You know what another issue is, though? None of the crimes, or villains, or motivations or abilities of the protagonists, or even situations in general are "realistic" enough in comic movies. Or really, in any movies or TV shows at all. I want to follow a real detective around for 2 hours in "real" time. You know, a guy sitting at his desk, probably filling out paperwork for some mundane convenience store robbery. Drinking coffee, maybe he'll use the toilet or engage in some banal chit-chat. "Real." Let's get it done, Snyder.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Forget "realism" and start thinking about "believability" - there's always some suspension of disbelief involved, but the less you have to think about it, the more successful the result, IMO.

Someone wearing underwear over lycra tights just looks silly - and a natural reaction for anyone seeing someone else dressed like that would be - WTF? Followed by laughter. It's not believable that someone who shows any fashion sense in their daily lives (regardless of how you define it), would then dress up in a clown costume unless their goal was not to be taken seriously - such as entertaining at a kids' party.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Same with the capes. And colorful outfits. And animal themed ears on helmets/masks. And spandex, or leather (even black leather) jumpsuits in general. etc. There is no honest threshold where one of these things makes sense and the others don't. You suspend disbelief on this order the minute you walk into the theater to watch comic book characters fighting evil villains. It's a stylistic choice, fine. But let's not try to argue that the undies are the one thing pushing this over into the realm of unbelievable silliness.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Pixelpiper said:

Forget "realism" and start thinking about "believability" - there's always some suspension of disbelief involved, but the less you have to think about it, the more successful the result, IMO.

Someone wearing underwear over lycra tights just looks silly - and a natural reaction for anyone seeing someone else dressed like that would be - WTF? Followed by laughter. It's not believable that someone who shows any fashion sense in their daily lives (regardless of how you define it), would then dress up in a clown costume unless their goal was not to be taken seriously - such as entertaining at a kids' party.

Click to expand...

What's not believable? Does that clothing combination violate a law of physics?

If shorts over pants are an incredibly 'omg' situation to you, you should probably leave the house a little more, bizarro brain.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

karamazov80 said:

Same with the capes. And colorful outfits. And animal themed ears on helmets/masks. And spandex, or leather (even black leather) jumpsuits in general. etc. There is no honest threshold where one of these things makes sense and the others don't. You suspend disbelief on this order the minute you walk into the theater to watch comic book characters fighting evil villains. It's a stylistic choice, fine. But let's not try to argue that the undies are the one thing pushing this over into the realm of unbelievable silliness.

Click to expand...

And there's not a thing in that list that you mentioned that you can't see more odd and bizarre **** at any given venue on any given night.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Sometimes there is a last straw. A wafer thin mint that just makes everything go pop.

There's plenty more and we can derail the thread forever. Shooting at the windows of an escaping vehicle instead of at the tires. Investigating "X" and ignoring a car that clearly belongs to the bad guy - disable it before they have a chance to get in and take off. Breaking basic traits of human nature is like nails on a chalkboard.

A movie is not a comic book - what works in one does not necessarily work in the other. You have to adapt to the medium you're working with.

I'm not even sure how this is turning into a debate. Clearly some people think a particular thing is stupid and others don't. The filmmakers can make up their own minds and fans will choose to spend or not spend any money watching the movies.

Re: Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice

Remy said:

Click to expand...

I really don't wanna see this movie, but every little Batman related news are sooooo tasty...

MUST... RE... SIST!