InArt - The Batman 1/6th Figure

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Just like Barry Bonds, his noggin got quite large lol...


1000345736_096d2c35e9.jpg
 
I agree the likeness is not 100% on the INART cowled sculpt, but imo, it’s still overall better between the two.

I know there’s one more person I’ve seen that also thinks the same thing, but are we really the only ones who thinks the eyes are really widely spaced on the HT cowl? If you were to remove the cowl, the eyes would be anatomically off. That alone kills it for me in any comparison discussion.

1B7C11E5-98B8-4F28-BD39-355AC75B020C.jpeg

Also, the side profile on the INART is considerably more accurate than the Hot Toys version where it’s more “squished in” for lack of a better word.
 
I agree the likeness is not 100% on the INART cowled sculpt, but imo, it’s still overall better between the two.

I know there’s one more person I’ve seen that also thinks the same thing, but are we really the only ones who thinks the eyes are really widely spaced on the HT cowl? If you were to remove the cowl, the eyes would be anatomically off. That alone kills it for me in any comparison discussion.

View attachment 699022

Also, the side profile on the INART is considerably more accurate than the Hot Toys version where it’s more “squished in” for lack of a better word.
What I don’t understand is how their bruce Wayne’s eyes look fine but then the HT has a different set of proportions. Doesn’t make sense. They could have used the same measurements. 😅
 
4295ED93-9243-4E2D-A1BE-4D991D081A88.jpeg

like, I’m sorry but this kills it.. lol. His eyes are Sid the Sloth-esque. INART’s is better proportioned and the anatomy is intact. I would’ve added it to the picture, I just haven’t found a good straight on headshot with the eyes looking up yet.
 
I agree the likeness is not 100% on the INART cowled sculpt, but imo, it’s still overall better between the two.

I know there’s one more person I’ve seen that also thinks the same thing, but are we really the only ones who thinks the eyes are really widely spaced on the HT cowl? If you were to remove the cowl, the eyes would be anatomically off. That alone kills it for me in any comparison discussion.
View attachment 699023

like, I’m sorry but this kills it.. lol. His eyes are Sid the Sloth-esque. INART’s is better proportioned and the anatomy is intact. I would’ve added it to the picture, I just haven’t found a good straight on headshot with the eyes looking up yet.
?????? Whatever you're smoking, you need to share! I think your imagination has gotten the better of you. :lol

All kidding aside, I think we're pretty much all in agreement that that the InArt cowl & head comes out on top, so we don't need to start seeing stuff that isn't there. If you compare the above to the photo of Pattinson that Wor-Gar posted on the previous page, the eye positions relative to the edges of his mouth seem pretty spot on. They may be fractionally wider but not way off like you're suggesting.
 
Pretty much the one detail that stood out to me in Jedha’s comparison video as a win for HT was the missing kneepad fastener clasp thing on InArts figure since they look to have gone with a working Velcro piece instead.
IMG_6980.jpeg


So now I need to know which is more accurate and if the IA has more detail around the back.
 
I’m interested to see a comparison of the sculpted hair Inart figure to Hot Toys. That version and the non deluxe Hot Toys version are much closer in price once you add in the tax and shipping cost from Sideshow.
Agreed. From the few shots I've seen, InArt's sculpted hair looks more detailed than HT, but there just haven't been a ton of looks at it. Where's the love for us peasants? 🤣
 
The biggest issue for me at least, as I'll be owning both, can stick the Hot Toys one inside Jazz Inc Batmobile, is that Hot Toys figures could be so much better if they just gave better bodies to their figures, the clothes always look oversized and stuffed rather than specially tailored to the models look. It reminds me of all the Captain America's, Thor, Superman, ect.

I ordered from Spec Fiction, I'll have it sometime in 2025. Missed out from Kit unfortunately. Looks great, some inaccuracies but it won't upset me at all.
 
A bit worried about the cowl material. How did the tip snap off?
 

Attachments

  • 507556-507510-Jedha-COMP-Hot-Toys-vs-InArt-4-20-24-5-.jpg
    507556-507510-Jedha-COMP-Hot-Toys-vs-InArt-4-20-24-5-.jpg
    46.7 KB · Views: 0
Definitely I'm amazed how well this figure posed compared to HT. In Jedha's video you can see how well it moves and the fact the suit is tailored specifically to the body. Issue with HT is that they use their ttm18 or ttm21 style bodies slightly modified but put padded fatsuits.
 
Back
Top