Thor: Love and Thunder **BEWARE SPOILERS**

I didn't mind Portman in the first two, but I had moved past her character at this point. This could also mean a return of Kat Dennings, and I've never been a big fan of her character. I've been really hoping for a return of Sif to the films in a bigger role and when I first saw the title, I thought it might be exploring that underlying relationship, but maybe that'll be a part of the next Guardians of the Galaxy movie. It would be interesting to see Sif interact with Hemsworth Thor since he's changed so much from the last time she saw him. Maybe some potential for some tension between the two characters there.

Viking Spawn said:

Agreed. If they truly wanted a believable female Thor... They should have choose an actress like....

View attachment 461839

Click to expand...

This actress is not believable either. She is tall and clumsy looking. She walks like she has two left feet.


I guess marvel is making a romance movie Thor judging from the title. They never get me to pay to see any MCU movie anyway.

DrunknIronRabit said:

Why padme how you've grown...

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

Click to expand...

Funny how certain people promote mediocre backsides to further the same centries old agenda.

I hate the title and am middle road when it comes to Portman's Jane. I just hope she doesn't actually become Thor, especially after the big reveal of Cap being worthy of picking up mjolnir.

Whstewart said:

Would you happen to remember the name of the arc? I'd like to pick up the graphic novels.

Click to expand...

If you want them in a nice hardcover format, you can get these:

https://www.amazon.com/Thor-Jason-A...way&sprefix=jason+aaron+mighty,aps,219&sr=8-8

https://www.amazon.com/Jason-Aaron-...way&sprefix=jason+aaron+mighty,aps,219&sr=8-7

https://www.amazon.com/Thor-Jason-A...y+jason+aaron&qid=1563716736&s=gateway&sr=8-2

Marvel trying to please the Hollywood lesbian Mafia.

Malgus said:

This actress is not believable either. She is tall and clumsy looking. She walks like she has two left feet.


I guess marvel is making a romance movie Thor judging from the title. They never get me to pay to see any MCU movie anyway.

Click to expand...

zeiss said:

...I would suspect most would agree that her acting really suffers when it is not a good match between her and the director (Star Wars).

Click to expand...

The title cracks me up because when I see it I imagine Jeff Goldlum saying it the same way he announced "Lord of Thunder..." lol.

Looking forward to this. Portman is a great actress, she just wasn't given much to do in the first two Thor movies. I liked Hemsworth and Thompson's chemistry in Ragnarok, not to mention Korg. Just add in BRB. Early rumor is Enchantress will be the villain. Maybe someone like Mangog would be a visually interesting addition. Just a shame that Jamie Alexander's Sif has gotten the short shrift, but there's always hope.

Can Portman even do 5 push ups? No. She aint no Thor

Malgus said:

Funny how certain people promote mediocre backsides to further the same centries old agenda.

Click to expand...

Mediocre @$$es are usually the first to REAR their heads...

Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk

nexus said:

Looking forward to this. Portman is a great actress, she just wasn't given much to do in the first two Thor movies. I liked Hemsworth and Thompson's chemistry in Ragnarok, not to mention Korg. Just add in BRB. Early rumor is Enchantress will be the villain. Maybe someone like Mangog would be a visually interesting addition. Just a shame that Jamie Alexander's Sif has gotten the short shrift, but there's always hope.

Click to expand...

Betta Ray Bill, man he got the shaft. About the only passing of the hammer I'd accept is to BRB.

Sweet Rabbit said:

Next question is will they give Jane Foster cancer in the movie

Click to expand...

They have to. That’s a cornerstone of character. If they don’t, that’s pretty messed up.

Chapter 2099 said:

They have it. That’s a cornerstone of character. If they don’t, that’s pretty messed up.

Click to expand...

It'll be as exciting and funny as Thor Ragnarok!

Boba Ben said:

I didn't mind Portman in the first two, but I had moved past her character at this point. This could also mean a return of Kat Dennings

Click to expand...

Dennings appeared on stage and was confirmed as Beta Ray Beatrice.

Jane Foster has cancer, and it's name is Kat Dennings.

Malgus said:

This actress is not believable either. She is tall and clumsy looking. She walks like she has two left feet.

I guess marvel is making a romance movie Thor judging from the title. They never get me to pay to see any MCU movie anyway.

Click to expand...

It seems that way unfortunately.

MegaPrime33 said:

I hate the title and am middle road when it comes to Portman's Jane. I just hope she doesn't actually become Thor, especially after the big reveal of Cap being worthy of picking up mjolnir.

Click to expand...

Agree with this.

This was the phase 4 film I was most looking forward to, her inclusion has virtually killed my enthusiasm for this film now - she was the worst part of the first two Thor films.

Concerning Portman as Thor, she can easily pull it off. Jane isn’t supposed to turn into this massive hulk of a being. She’s well toned and in shape. That’s about it. I don’t see why Portman couldn’t pull that off. (She’s already looks the part, IMO.) And we all know she can act, so that’s not a question.

I honesty think this will play out perfectly. I’m most worried about how they write her. In typical MCU fashion, I expect them to stray so far from the origin stories, etc. that literally all we get is a character by the name of Thor and no ties to her comic “roots.”