Should Bruce Willis stop starring in action movies?

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
While he fits perfect in RED, it's only because it doesn't take itself seriously. I think his McClane days ended with Vengeance. He needs to hang up the holsters. He was tied with Taintum for ruining GI Joe Retaliation. Live Free was horrid and A Good Day was 98 minutes of my life I'm not getting back. Sad thing is, the best McClane moments in A Good Day were cut out showing not even Hollywood gets him anymore. Die Hard 6 should be titled Die at the Box Office instead of Die Hardest.
 
I rather like some of his recent action flicks. He's certainly no more washed-up than the Village Voice.

SnakeDoc
 
While he fits perfect in RED, it's only because it doesn't take itself seriously. I think his McClane days ended with Vengeance. He needs to hang up the holsters. He was tied with Taintum for ruining GI Joe Retaliation. Live Free was horrid and A Good Day was 98 minutes of my life I'm not getting back. Sad thing is, the best McClane moments in A Good Day were cut out showing not even Hollywood gets him anymore. Die Hard 6 should be titled Die at the Box Office instead of Die Hardest.
:lol

Yeah - interesting to see his transition over the years. I'm not necessarily a Bruce Willis 'devotee'.. but I believe I own some of his best films to date - all two of them. :lol

*Pulp Fiction
*Fifth Element

Both are absolute classics. :)

I never got into the Die Hard series, haven't bothered with the other bunch of meh films he's done (haven't seen 12 Monkeys in years but I know it's one of the good ones), & Expendables etc - snooze. I actually really like his work back in the Moonlighting days.
 
Last edited:
I rather enjoyed the last two Die Hard movies much more so than the third one which I thought sucked as a whole.
 
:lol

Yeah - interesting to see his transition over the years. I'm not necessarily a Bruce Willis 'devotee'.. but I believe I own some of his best films to date - all two of them. :lol

*Pulp Fiction
*Fifth Element

Both are absolute classics. :)

I never got into the Die Hard series, haven't bothered with the other bunch of meh films he's done (haven't seen 12 Monkeys in years but I know it's one of the good ones), & Expendables etc - snooze. I actually really like his work back in the Moonlighting days.

One does not 'get into' the Die Hard series. One is into it by default. Mileage may vary as to how many of the sequels one likes but the first film is universally agreed to be a modern classic.

That is all Vintij. My god man.
 
Yeah, clearly he can still shine in something like 12 Monkeys, Pulp Fiction, Unbreakable, and Looper. But they aren't by the numbers action movies by any means. He does seem bored with traditional action fare, and as Vern says in that article, it's kind of funny how he has transformed into what movie studios perceive as a traditional action star, since he wasn't that at all when he started out. He was about as far removed from First Blood Part 2 Rambo as an action star could be. As a-dev says, Die Hard is a classic, and I'm sure part of the reason was that it was so fresh and different from everything else. The last couple of Die Hard films just seemed to be him showing up for a paycheck. Cashing in on the goodwill he has earned through earlier, much more interesting films.

I am still a Willis fan, but I want to see him in more creative movies like Looper that are worth the time to watch. And the impression in his interviews is that he feels the same way. His attitude toward Expendables 3 makes a lot of sense from that POV.
 
Willis was still good...Die Hard 1&2, Fifth Element, Mercury Rising,Red, Looper,12 Monkeys, Pulp Fiction, Sixth Sense and Unbreakable were pretty good to me

Oh I wasn't denying that he wasn't good, it's just that Osment really sold the film for me.
 
But sixth sense and unbreakable are not action movies? That's not the question at hand.

:lecture:lecture:lecture:exactly:

Yeah, clearly he can still shine in something like 12 Monkeys, Pulp Fiction, Unbreakable, and Looper. But they aren't by the numbers action movies by any means. He does seem bored with traditional action fare, and as Vern says in that article, it's kind of funny how he has transformed into what movie studios perceive as a traditional action star, since he wasn't that at all when he started out. He was about as far removed from First Blood Part 2 Rambo as an action star could be. As a-dev says, Die Hard is a classic, and I'm sure part of the reason was that it was so fresh and different from everything else. The last couple of Die Hard films just seemed to be him showing up for a paycheck. Cashing in on the goodwill he has earned through earlier, much more interesting films.

I am still a Willis fan, but I want to see him in more creative movies like Looper that are worth the time to watch. And the impression in his interviews is that he feels the same way. His attitude toward Expendables 3 makes a lot of sense from that POV.

Something Stallone eluded to in his tweets with the "lazy and greedy" remark.
 
Back
Top